Soil & Water Res., 2008, 3(10):S123-S129 | DOI: 10.17221/11/2008-SWR

Spatial variability of water repellency in pine forest soil

Tomá¹ Orfánus1, Zoltán Bedrna2, ¥ubomír Lichner1, Paul D. Hallett3, Karol Kòava1, Michal Sebíò1
1 Institute of Hydrology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovakia
2 Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia
3 Scottish Crop Research Institute, Invergowrie, Dundee, United Kingdom

The variability of water repellency of pine-forest arenic regosols and its influence on infiltration processes were measured in southwest Slovakia. The water drop penetration time (WDPT) tests of soil water repellency and infiltration tests with a miniature tension infiltrometer (3 mm diameter) were performed. Large differences in infiltration were observed over centimetre spatial resolution, with WDPT tests suggesting water repellency varying from extreme to moderate levels. For soils with severe to extreme water repellency determined with WDPT, steady state infiltration was not reached in tests with the miniature tension infiltrometer, making it impossible to estimate sorptivity. Where sorptivity could be measured, the correlation with WDPT was poor. All results suggest that hydraulic properties of soil change below the centimetre scale resolution of the current study, probably due to a presence of unevenly distributed hydrophobic material.

Keywords: spatial variability; water repellency; WDPT test; infiltration; sorptivity

Published: December 31, 2008  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Orfánus T, Bedrna Z, Lichner ¥, Hallett PD, Kòava K, Sebíò M. Spatial variability of water repellency in pine forest soil. Soil & Water Res. 2008;3(Special Issue 1):S123-129. doi: 10.17221/11/2008-SWR.
Download citation

References

  1. Bauters T.W.J., Steenhuis T.S., DiCarlo D.A., Nieber J.L., Dekker L.W., Ritsema C.J., Parlange J.Y., Haverkamp R. (2000): Physics of water repellent soils. Journal of Hydrology, 231-232: 233-243. Go to original source...
  2. Czachor, H. (2006): Modelling the effect of pore structure and wetting angles on capillary rise in soils having different wettabilities. Journal of Hydrology, 328: 604-613. Go to original source...
  3. Czachor H., Flis-Bujak M., Kafarski M., Król A. (2008): Wetting angle and water sorptivity in mineral soils. Soil and Water Research, 3 (Special Issue 1): S52-S57. Go to original source...
  4. Dekker L.W., Ritsema C.J. (1994): How water moves in a water repellent sandy soil: 1. Potential and actual water repellency. Water Resources Research, 30: 2507-2517. Go to original source...
  5. Graber E.R., Ben-Arie O., Wallach R. (2006): Effect of sample disturbance on soil water repellency determination in sandy soils. Geoderma, 136: 11-19. Go to original source...
  6. Hallett P.D., Young I.M. (1999): Changes to water repellence of soil aggregates caused by substrateinduced microbial activity. European Journal of Soil Science, 50: 35-40. Go to original source...
  7. Hallett P.D., Nunan N., Douglas J.T., Young I.M. (2004): Millimeter-scale spatial variability in soil water sorptivity: scale, surface elevation, and subcritical repellency effects. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 68: 352-358. Go to original source...
  8. Kalivodová E., Kubíèek F., Bedrna Z., Kalivoda H., Gavlas V., Kollár J., Gajdo¹ P., ©tepanovièová O. (2002): Sand Dunes of Slovakia. Luka-Press, Bratislava. (in Slovak)
  9. Kutilek M., Nielsen D.R. (1994): Soil Hydrology. Catena Verlag, Cremlingen-Destedt.
  10. Lichner ¥., Ni¾nanská Z., Fa¹ko P., ©ír M., Tesaø M. (2005): The impact of plant cover and weather on soil-hydrological parameters of a water repellent soil at the locality Mláky II at Sekule. Acta Hydrologica Slovaca, 6: 321-329. (in Slovak)
  11. Lichner ¥., Hallett P.D., Feeney D., Ïugová O., ©ír M., Tesaø M. (2007): Field measurement of the impact of hydrophobicity on soil water transport under different vegetation over time. Biologia, 62: 537-541. Go to original source...
  12. Nunan N., Ritz K., Wu K., Young I. M., Crawford J. W. (2002): In situ spatial patterns of soil bacterial populations, mapped at multiple scales in arable soil. Microbial Ecology, 44: 296-305. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Roy J.L., McGill W.B. (2002): Assessing soil water repellency using the molarity of ethanol droplet (MED) test. Soil Science, 167: 83-97. Go to original source...
  14. Soil Survey Division Staff (1993): Soil Survey Manual. Soil Conservation Service. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18, Washington, DC.
  15. Wahl N.A., Bens O., Schäfer B., Hüttl R.F. (2003): Impact of changes in land-use management on soil hydraulic properties: hydraulic conductivity, water repellency and water retention. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 28: 1377-1387. Go to original source...
  16. Wahl N.A., Wöllecke B., Bens O., Hüttl R.F. (2005): Can forest transformation help reducing floods in forested watersheds? Certain aspects on soil hydraulics and organic matter properties. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 30: 611-621. Go to original source...
  17. White I., Sully M.J. (1987): Macroscopic and microscopic capillary length and time scales from field infiltration. Water Resources Research, 23: 1514-1522. Go to original source...
  18. WRB (1994): World Reference Base for Soil Resources. Wageningen/Rome.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.