Soil & Water Res., 2009, 4(4):142-148 | DOI: 10.17221/12/2009-SWR
Evaluation of crop effects on runoff and washout of soil from the surface of agricultural landOriginal Paper
- 1 Research Institute for Soil and Water Conservation, Brno, Czech Republic
- 2 Mendel University of Agriculture and Forestry in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
Measurements of the runoff intensity (i.e. its volume and amounts of washed out soil particles) were performed on experimental plots with the slope gradient of 5° within the period of 2004-2008. Experimental plots were covered with different types of crops: crops with wide rows (maize, potatoes), no row crops (cereals) and permanent grasslands (both extensively and intensively managed). The main objective of this study was to quantify the effect of individual crops on the reduction of runoff and erosion transport (i.e. washout) of soil from the surface of agricultural land. Data measured on individual experimental plots were compared with control, which was represented by a plot of bare soil. As compared with control, markedly reduced values of both runoff and washout (86 and 99%, respectively) were measured on plots covered with cereals within the study period. In maize stands, the corresponding values were 21 and 11%, respectively. The obtained results may support and contribute to the proposal of organisational soil protection measures and their implementation on agricultural land. In erosion-endangered localities an appropriate selection of individual crops represents an important tool, which can significantly support other protective measures, especially those of technical character.
Keywords: water erosion; runoff; precipitations; vegetative cover
Published: December 31, 2009 Show citation
References
- Badalíková B., Hrubý J. (2005): Impact of different perennial wheat growth founding on soil environment. Úroda, 6: 5-7. (in Czech)
- Gordon J.M., Bennett S.J., Alfonso C.V., Bingner R.L. (2008): Modelling long term soil losses on agricultural fields due to ephemeral gully erosion. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 63: 173-181.
Go to original source... - Hejduk S., Kasprzak K. (2004): Advantages and risks of grassland stands from the viewpoint of flood occurrence. Grassland Science in Europe, 9: 228-230.
- Hejduk S., Kasprzak K. (2005): A contribution to proposals of the width of protective grasslands strips. Soil and Water, No. 4: 30-35.
- Janeček M., Dumbrovský M., Dostál T., Hůla J., Kubátová E., Podhrázská J. et al. (2007): Protection of Agricultural Soils from the Soil Erosion. VÚMOP Praha. (in Czech)
- Kvítek T., Novák P., Duffková R., Fučík P., Lexa M. et al. (2004): Principles of the Differentiated Zones Management using the Permanent Grassland in the Water Resources Catchments. VÚMOP Praha. (in Czech)
- Uhlířová J., Podhrázská J. (2007): Evaluation of efficiency of the flood and erosion protecting measurements. Pozemkové úpravy, 61: 10-12. (in Czech)
- Wischmeier W.H., Smith D.D. (1978): Predicting Rainfall Erosion Losses. A Guide to Conservation Planning. USDA-SEA, U.S. Governmental Printing Office, Washington.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.