Soil & Water Res., 2010, 5(4):161-171 | DOI: 10.17221/24/2010-SWR

Do Andosols occur in the Czech Republic?Original Paper

Pavel Novák, Tomáš Khel, Jan Vopravil, Jitka Lagová
Research Institute for Soil and Water Conservation, Prague, Czech Republic

The aim of this contribution was either to confirm or refuse the supposition that there are soils on the volcanic effusive rocks in the Bruntál district which can be assigned to the referential group of Andosols. The conditions for the genesis of Andosols are described and the diagnostic criteria of the andic process are defined both according to the principles of the WBR/FAO 2006 classification and according to the Slovak MKSPS 2000 classification system. In the Czech classification system, the diagnostics of Andosols has not yet been described or defined because their occurrence on the territory of the Czech Republic has not been confirmed till now. On the Velký Roudný volcanic dome (780 m), samples from two profiles were taken and described: one from below the summit as a sample of forest soil, and the other from the terraced, grass-covered foot of the hill, formerly used as a ploughed land. The samples from the two profiles were processed, and analyses were carried out according to both the classification systems mentioned above. The results of the analyses were subsequently evaluated. It was discovered that both evaluated profiles conformed to most of the diagnostic characteristics of andic development according to both WRB 2006 and the Slovak 2000 classification systems. Both evaluated profiles could be then classified - according to WRB 2006 - as Vitric Andosol (Dystric) and Vitric - Umbric Andosol (Dystric, Colluvic), respectivelly; according to Slovak Classification System as Andic Cambisols. The occurrence of soils with andic development in the Czech Republic was thus confirmed. The conclusion drawn by some authors (eg. in US Taxonomy) that a higher content of volcanic glass and a substrate of andesite type are not an indispensable condition for the creation of soils classified as Andosols was also confirmed. Likewise, according to the WRB criteria, a melanic humus horizon is not a necessary condition. Because of the difficulties in distinguishing the types, the Czech classification system recommends that a humic andic horizon should be evaluated as molic. We assume that in some cases it could be better classified as umbric. A preliminary proposal has been put forward to insert the Andozem soil types in Taxonomic Soil Classification System of the Czech Republic: Haplic Andosol, Vitric Andosol, Lithic Andosol, Umbric Andosol, but the properties and criteria of those soils will have to be defined precisely. One problem which will also have to be resolved is how to allocate the profiles displaying andic properties either to the proposed subtype of Cambic Andosol or to the subtype of Andic Cambisol (outside the referential class of Andsols). This issue is, indeed, not dealt with satisfactorily either by the Slovak system or the worldwide WRB 2006 classification, either.

Keywords: Andosols; diagnostic characteristics; genesis; occurrence in the Czech Republic; proposal for Czech classification

Published: December 31, 2010  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Novák P, Khel T, Vopravil J, Lagová J. Do Andosols occur in the Czech Republic? Soil & Water Res. 2010;5(4):161-171. doi: 10.17221/24/2010-SWR.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Amano Y. (1988): The Andisols-Entisols transition. In: Proc. 9th Int. Soil Classification Workshop. Soil Management Support Service, Washington D.C.
    2. Anonymous (1967): Comprehensive Soil Survey of Bruntal District. Report. Maps 1:50 000, Maps 1:5 000. ESSP - Czech Academia of Agricultural Sciences, Prague.
    3. Anonymous (1993): Munsell Soil Color Charts. Eijkelkamp, Glesbeek.
    4. Arnold R. (1996): Keys to Soil Taxonomy. 7th Ed. USDA/ NRCS, Washington D.C.
    5. Arnold R.W. (1988): The worldwide distribution of Andisols and the need for an Andisol order in US Soil Taxonomy. Soil Management Support Service, Washington D.C.
    6. Balkovič J. (2002): Soils with Andic Properties in Choosen Slovakia Mountains. [P h. D. T h e s i s.] K o mensky University Bratislava.
    7. Barth V. (1977): Basaltic volcanos in middle part of Jeseniky Mountains. Journal for Mineralogy and Geology, 22: 279-291.
    8. Brady N.C., Weil R.R. (2002): The Nature and Properties of Soils. Prentice Hall-Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
    9. FAO (2006): Guidelines for Soil Description. 4th Ed. FAO, Rome.
    10. Frejková L. (1952): Contribution to knowledge of Moravian-Slezian volcanos of low Jeseniky Mountains. Journal of Nature Sciences of Ostrava Region, 13: 315-334.
    11. Higashi T. (1983): Characterisation of Al/Fe humus complexes in Dystrandepts through the comparision with synthetic forms. Geoderma, 31: 277-288. Go to original source...
    12. Holuša O. (2003): Finding of Andosol at National Nature Relic Great Roudny (Low Jeseniky Bioregion). Study of Beskyd Museum, Frýdek-Místek, Natural Sciences No. 3, 221-224.
    13. HonnaT., Yamamoto S., Matsui K. (1988): A simple procedure to determine melanic index that is useful for differentiating Melanic from Fulvic Andisols. Icomand, Intern. Committe on the Classification of Andisols, New Zealand Soil Bureau, Lower Hut.
    14. Hraško et al. (1991): Morphogenetic Soil Classification System of Czecho-Slovakia. RISC Bratislava.
    15. Juráni B., Balkovič J. (2007): Soils of volcanic regions in Slovakia. In: Soils of Volcanic Regions in Europe. Springer, Berlin, 82-102. Go to original source...
    16. Němeček J., Smolíková L., Kutílek M. (1990): Pedology and Paleopedology. Academia, Prague.
    17. Němeček J. et al. (2001): The Czech Taxonomic Soil Classification System. Czech Agricultural University, Prague.
    18. Novák P. et al. (1990-1992): Synthetic Soil Map of the Czech Republic 1:200 000, Sheet B5 - Opava, Ministry of Agriculture, Prague.
    19. Pacák O. (1928): Basalts of Jeseniky Mountains and Closed Region. Journal of Royal Czech Society of Sciences, Prague, No. 4, 172-186.
    20. Roth Z. et al. (1962): Explanation to Overview of Geology, Map of CSSR 1:200 000, Sheet M-33-XXIV, Geofond Prague.
    21. Shoji S., Otowa M. (1988): Distribution and significance of Andisols in Japan. In: Proc. 9th Int. Soil Classification Workshop. Soil Management Support Service, Washington D.C.
    22. Shoji S., Nanzyo M., Dahlgren R.A. (1993): Volcanic ash soils: genesis, properties and utilization. Developments in Soil Science, No. 21, Elsevier Amsterdam.
    23. Shoji S., Nanzyo O., Dahlgren R. A., Quantin P. (1996): Evaluation and proposed revisions of criteria for Andosols in the WRB. Soil Science, 161: 604-615. Go to original source...
    24. Sobocká J. et al. (2000): Morphogenetic Classification System of Soils of Slovakia. RISC Bratislava.
    25. Soil Survey Staff (1999): Soil Taxonomy. A Basic System of Soil Classification for Making and Interpreting Soil Surveys. Agricultural Handbook 476, USDA Washington D.C.
    26. Stejskal J. (1958): Agricultural Geology. Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, State Agricultural Publishing, Prague.
    27. Šály R. (2000): Soil of Nature Protected Region - Biospheric Reservation Polana. RISP Zvolen - Bratislava.
    28. Takahashi T., Nanzyo M., Shoji S. (2004): Proposed revisions to the diagnostic criteria for andic and vitric horizons and qualifiers on Andosols in the WRB for Soil Resources. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr., 50: 431-437 Go to original source...
    29. Tan H.K. (1984): Andosols. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
    30. WRB-FAO (1998): World Reference Base for Soil Resources. 1st Ed. ISRIC-FAO, Rome.
    31. WRB (2006): World Reference Base for Soil Resources, 2nd Ed. ISRIC-FAO, Rome.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content