Soil & Water Res., 2013, 8(1):26-33 | DOI: 10.17221/36/2012-SWR

Comparison of rainfall-runoff models for design discharge assessment in a small ungauged catchmentOriginal Paper

Darina Vaššová
Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic

Design discharges in a small experimental catchment in Žarošice (Czech Republic) were evaluated using various methods for peak discharge assessment applying 24-h storm rainfalls reduced to short duration. Rainfall-runoff models HEC-HMS based on standard Natural Resources Conservation Service hydrologic methods and KINFIL, which combines the Morel-Seytoux infiltration and kinematic wave direct runoff transformation, were used to compute runoff hydrographs. The approach of technical standard and Froehlich's method determined the peak discharges only. The aim of this study was to assess the ability of these methods to predict design peak discharge in comparison with the data obtained from the Czech Hydrometeorological Institute (CHMI), which is the authority for providing hydrological data in the Czech Republic. The results demonstrate that the peak discharges computed by Froehlich's method are mostly closest to the data provided by CHMI. For the 100-year flood, HEC-HMS based on the Curve Number method showed the best agreement.

Keywords: Curve Number; design rainfall; peak discharge

Published: March 31, 2013  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Vaššová D. Comparison of rainfall-runoff models for design discharge assessment in a small ungauged catchment. Soil & Water Res. 2013;8(1):26-33. doi: 10.17221/36/2012-SWR.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Adams B.J., Howard C.D.D. (1986): Design storm pathology. Canadian Water Resources Journal, 11: 49-55. Go to original source...
    2. Al-Qurashi A., McIntyre N., Wheater H., Unkrich C. (2008): Application of the Kineros2 rainfall-runoff model to an arid catchment in Oman. Journal of Hydrology, 355: 91-105. Go to original source...
    3. Beven K.J. (1989): Changing ideas in hydrology: the case of physically-based models. Journal of Hydrology, 105: 157-172. Go to original source...
    4. Buchanan B., Easton Z.M., Schneider R., Walter M.T. (2012): Incorporation variable source area hydrology into a spatially distributed direct runoff model. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 48: 43-60. Go to original source...
    5. Bulygina N., McIntyre N., Wheater H. (2011): Bayesian conditioning of rainfall-runoff model for predicting flows in ungauged catchments and under land use changes. Water Resources Research, 47: W02503. Go to original source...
    6. Ewen J., Parkin G., O'Connell P.E. (2000): SHETRAN: Distributed river basin flow and transport modeling system. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 5: 250-258. Go to original source...
    7. Froehlich D.C. (2012): Graphical calculation of small catchment peak discharge. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 138: 245-256. Go to original source...
    8. Guo Y. (2001): Hydrologic design of urban flood control detention ponds. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 6: 472-479. Go to original source...
    9. Guo Y., Markus M. (2011): Analytical probabilistic approach for estimating design flood peaks of small watersheds. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 16: 847-857. Go to original source...
    10. Hjelmfelt A.T. (1991): Investigation of curve number procedure. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 117: 725-737. Go to original source...
    11. Hrádek F. (1988): Design Discharges for Very Small Catchments. Technical Standard. Hydroprojekt, Prague. (in Czech)
    12. Hrádek F., Kovář P. (1994): Computation of substitute storm rainfall intensities. Vodní Hospodářství, 11: 49-53. (in Czech)
    13. Kovář P. (2000): Hydrologic Models Application For Maximum Discharge Assessment On Small Catchments. CULS, Prague. (in Czech)
    14. Kovář P. (2006): The extent of land use impact on water regime. Plant, Soil and Environment, 52: 239-244. Go to original source...
    15. Kovář P., Vaššová D., Hrabalíková M. (2011): Mitigation of surface runoff and erosion impacts on catchment by stone hedgerows. Soil and Water Research, 6: 153-164. Go to original source...
    16. Kovář P., Vaššová D., Janeček M. (2012): Surface runoff simulation to mitigate the impact of soil erosion, case study of Třebsín (Czech Republic). Soil and Water Research, 7: 85-96. Go to original source...
    17. Mein R.G., Larson C.L. (1973): Modeling infiltration during a steady rain. Water Resources Research, 9: 384-394. Go to original source...
    18. Morel-Seytoux H.J., Verdin J.P. (1981): Extension of the SCS Rainfall Runoff Methodology for Ungaged Watersheds. [Report FHWA/RD-81/060.] U.S. National Technical Information Service, Springfield.
    19. NRCS (1986): Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds. Technical Release 55 (13), U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington D.C.
    20. NRCS (2004a): Chapter 10 Estimation of Direct Runoff from Storm Rainfall. National Engineering Handbook, Part 630 Hydrology. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington D.C.
    21. NRCS (2004b): Chapter 9 Hydrologic Soil-Cover Complexes. National Engineering Handbook, Part 630 Hydrology. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington D.C.
    22. NRCS (2007): Chapter 16 Hydrographs. National Engineering Handbook, Part 630 Hydrology. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington D.C.
    23. NRCS (2010): Chapter 15 Time of Concentration. National Engineering Handbook, Part 630 Hydrology. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington D.C.
    24. Packman J.C., Kidd C.H.R. (1980): A logical approach to the design storm concept. Water Resources Research, 16: 994-1000. Go to original source...
    25. Refsgaard J.C., Storm B. (1995): MIKE SHE. In: Singh V.P. (ed.): Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology. Highlands Ranch, Colorado, USA: Water Resources Publications.
    26. Rojas R., Julien P., Johnson B. (2003): CASC2D-SED v. 1.0 - Reference Manual. A 2D­ imensional Rainfall-Runoff and Sediment Model. Colorado State University, Fort Collins.
    27. Singh V.P. (1996): Kinematic Wave Modeling in Water Resources: Surface-Water Hydrology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
    28. Soulis K.X., Valiantzas J.D. (2012): SCS-CN parameter determination using rainfall-runoff data in heterogeneous watersheds - the two-CN system approach. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 16: 1001-1015. Go to original source...
    29. Šamaj F., Brázdil R., Valovič J. (1983): Daily rainfall heights with extraordinary intensities in Czechoslovakia in the period 1901-1980. In. Proc. SHMI. Alfa, Bratislava. (in Slovak)
    30. USACE (2000): Hydrologic Modeling System HEC-HMS - Technical Reference Manual. Hydrologic Engineering Center - US Army Corps of Engineers, Davis.
    31. Vaššová D., Kovář P. (2011): DES_RAIN. Program for Design Rainfall Computation. CULS, Prague. (in Czech)
    32. Vrugt J.A., Diks C.G. H., Gupta H.V., Bouten W., Verstraten J.M. (2005): Improved treatment of uncertainty in hydrologic modeling: Combining the strengths of global optimization and data assimilation. Water Resources Research, 41: 1-17. Go to original source...
    33. White E.D., Easton Z.M., Fuka D.R., Collick A.S., Adgo E., McCartney M., Awulachew S.B., Selassie Y.G., Steenhuis T.S. (2011): Development and application of a physically based landscape water balance in the SWAT model. Hydrological Processes, 25: 915-925. Go to original source...
    34. Woolhiser D.A, Liggett J.A. (1967): Unsteady, one-dimensional flow over a plane - the rising hydrograph. Water Resources Research, 3: 753-771. Go to original source...
    35. Woolhiser D.A., Hanson C.L., Kuhlman A.R. (1970): Overland flow on rangeland watersheds. Journal of Hydrology, 9: 336-356.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content