Soil & Water Res., 2013, 8(2):56-62 | DOI: 10.17221/28/2012-SWR

Assessment of a soil with moderate level of contamination using lettuce seed assay and terrestrial isopods assimilation assayOriginal Paper

Flavio Manoel Rodrigues DA SILVA JÚNIOR1, Edariane Menestrino GARCIA1, Paulo Roberto Martins BAISCH2, Nicolai MIRLEAN2, Ana Luíza MUCCILLO-BAISCH1
1 Laboratório de Ensaios Farmacológicos e Toxicológicos, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas and
2 Laboratório de Oceanografia Geológica, Instituto de Oceanografia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul - FURG, Rio Grande, Brasil

Lettuce (Lactuca sativa) seeds play a significant role in toxicity tests of isolated chemicals, pesticides, and environmental samples. Commonly, the main variables under study are the rate of seed germination and root elongation at the end of five days of exposure. Another organisms used in environmental assessment of soil quality are terrestrial isopods. The parameter evaluated in this assay is usually mortality rate. In this study, we suggest to use the daily number of germinated seeds and wet weight of plants, and feeding measurements (consumption rate, assimilation rate, assimilation efficiency and growth rate) in woodlice (Armadillidium vulgare and Porcellio dilatatus) to detect toxicity of moderately contaminated soil samples. The lettuce seed assay proved to be more efficient in the tested conditions, however, we do not reject the use of feeding parameters in terrestrial isopods in toxicological screening of contaminated soils.

Keywords: Lactuca sativa; short-term bioassays; soil contamination; woodlice

Published: June 30, 2013  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
DA SILVA JÚNIOR FMR, GARCIA EM, BAISCH PRM, MIRLEAN N, MUCCILLO-BAISCH AL. Assessment of a soil with moderate level of contamination using lettuce seed assay and terrestrial isopods assimilation assay. Soil & Water Res. 2013;8(2):56-62. doi: 10.17221/28/2012-SWR.
Download citation

References

  1. CONAMA (2009): Standard 420. Disposes on Criteria and Guidelines Values o f Soil Quality Concerning the Presence of Chemical Substances and Establishes Guidelines for Environmental Management of Areas Contaminated by These Substances as a Result of Anthropogenic Activities. Conselho Nacional do Meio Ambiente, Brasília. (in Portuguese)
  2. Cunha N.G., Silveira R.J.C., Severo C.R.S. (1995): Study from soils of Rio Grande Municipality. Universitária/ UFPel; EMBRAPA/CPACT. Documentos 16/96. Pelotas. (in Portuguese)
  3. Da Silva Júnior F.M.R., Rocha J.A.V., Vargas V.M.F. (2009): Extraction parameters in the mutagenicity assay of soil samples. Science of the Total Environment, 407: 6017-6023. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Donker M.H. (1992): Energy reserves and distribution of metals in populations of the isopod Porcellio scaber from metal contaminated sites. Functional Ecology, 6: 445-454. Go to original source...
  5. Drobne D. (1997): Terrestrial isopods - a good choice for toxicity testing of pollutants in the terrestrial environment. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 16: 1159-1164. Go to original source...
  6. Drobne D., Hopkin S.P. (1995): The toxicity of zinc to terrestrial isopods in a standard laboratory test. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 31: 1-6. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Eom I.C., Rast C., Veber A.M., Vasseur P. (2007): Ecotoxicity of a polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH)contaminated soil. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 67: 190-205. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Gong P., Wilke B.M., Fleischmann S. (1999): Soil-based phytotoxicity of 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene (TNT) to terrestrial higher plants. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 36: 152-157. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Hassall M., Zimmer M., Loureiro S. (2005): Questions and possible new directions for research into the biology of terrestrial isopods. European Journal of Soil Biology, 41: 57-61. Go to original source...
  10. Keddy C.J., Greene J.C., Bonnell M.A. (1995): Review of whole-organism bioassays: soil, freshwater sediment and freshwater assessment in Canada. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 30: 221-251. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Lors C., Ponge J-F., Aldaya M.M., Daminot D. (2010): Comparison of solid-phase bioassays and ecoscores to evaluate the toxicity of contaminated soils. Environmental Pollution, 158: 2640-2647. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Martí E., Sierra J., Sanchez M., Cruañas R., Garau M.A. (2007): Ecotoxicological tests assessment of soils polluted by chromium(VI) or pentachlorophenol. Science of the Total Environment, 378: 53-57. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Odendaal J.P., Reinecke A.J. (2004): Effect of metal mixtures (Cd and Zn) on body weight in terrestrial isopods. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 46: 377-384. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Paoletti M.G., Hassall M. (1999): Woodlice (Isopoda: Oniscidea): their potential for assessing sustainability and use as bioindicators. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 74: 157-165. Go to original source...
  15. Paton G.I., Killham K., Weitz H.J., Semple K.T. (2005): Biological tools for the assessment of contaminated land: applied soil ecotoxicology. Soil Use Management, 21: 487-499. Go to original source...
  16. Plaza G., Nalecz-Jawecki G., Ulfig K., Brigmon R.L. (2005): Assessment of genotoxic activity of petroleum hydrocarbon-bioremediated soil. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 62: 415-420. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Ribeiro S., Souza J.P., Nogueira A.J.A., Soares A.M.V.M. (2001): Effect of endosulfan and parathion on energy reserves and physiological parameters of the terrestrial isopod Porcellio dilatatus. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 49: 131-138. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Robidoux P.Y., Gong P., Sarrazin M., Bardai G., Paquet L., Hawari J., Dubois C., Sunahara G.I. (2004): Toxicity assessment of contaminated soils from an antitank firing range. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 58, 300-313. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Smith M.J., Flowers T.H., Duncan H.J., Alder J. (2006): Effects of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons on germination and subsequent growth of grasses and legumes in freshly contaminated soil and soil with aged PAHs residues. Environmental Pollution, 141: 519-525. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Sverdrup L.E., Krogh P.H., Nielsen T., Kjaer C., Stenersen J. (2003): Toxicity of eight polycyclic aromatic compounds to red clover (Trifolium pratense), ryegrass (Lolium perenne), and mustard (Sinapsis alba). Chemosphere, 53: 993-1003. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. USEPA (1989): Protocol for Short Term Toxicity Screening of Hazardous Waste Sites. EPA, Chicago.
  22. Valerio M.E., García J.F., Peinado F.M. (2007): Determination of phytotoxicity of soluble elements in soils, based on a bioassay with lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.). Science of the Total Environment, 378: 63-66. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Whang W., Freemark K. (1995): The use of plants for environmental monitoring and assessment. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 30: 289-301. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Zimmer M., Kautz G., Topp W. (2003): Leaf litter-colonizing microbiota: supplementary food source or indicator of food quality for Porcellio scaber (Isopoda: Oniscidea). European Journal of Soil Biology, 39: 209-216. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.