Soil & Water Res., 2013, 8(3):97-104 | DOI: 10.17221/62/2012-SWR

Mapping the topsoil pH and humus quality of forest soils in the North Bohemian Jizerské hory Mts. region with ordinary, universal, and regression kriging: cross-validation comparisonOriginal Paper

Radim VAŠÁT, Lenka PAVLŮ, Luboš BORŮVKA, Ondřej DRÁBEK, Antonín NIKODEM
Department of Soil Science and Soil Protection, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic

North Bohemia belongs to one of the most heavily industrialized and polluted regions in Europe. The enormous acid deposition which culminated in the 1970s has largely contributed to the accelerated acidification process in the soils and consequently to the wide forest decline in North Bohemian mountains. In this paper we map the active topsoil pH and humus quality with ordinary, universal, and regression kriging and compare the accuracy of resulting maps with cross-validation. For the regression kriging we use two types of spatially exhaustive auxiliary information, first the altitude derived from digital elevation model and second the land cover classes derived from satellite imagery. The leave-one-out (cross-validation) statistics, i.e. mean error, root mean squared error, and mean squared deviation ratio, are taken for comparison since they are widely accepted as measurements of the accuracy of digital soil maps. The results show that the regression kriging is superior over other kriging methods in this case. Out of 97 sampling sites the regression kriging with land cover classes is the best predictor at 32 sites for pH and at 30 sites for humus quality, the regression kriging with altitude at 31 and 25 sites, the universal kriging at 21 and 23 sites, and the ordinary kriging at 13 and 18 sites. The highest number of best predictions for regression kriging implies that the topsoil pH and humus quality are driven approximately equally by land cover and altitude and little less by pure geographic position. Furthermore, the universal kriging maps show a northeast to southwest spatial trend of topsoil pH and a northwest to southeast spatial trend for humus quality.

Keywords: Black Triangle; digital soil mapping; geostatistics; map accuracy

Published: September 30, 2013  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
VAŠÁT R, PAVLŮ L, BORŮVKA L, DRÁBEK O, NIKODEM A. Mapping the topsoil pH and humus quality of forest soils in the North Bohemian Jizerské hory Mts. region with ordinary, universal, and regression kriging: cross-validation comparison. Soil & Water Res. 2013;8(3):97-104. doi: 10.17221/62/2012-SWR.
Download citation

References

  1. Akselsson C., Ardö J., Sverdrup H. (2004): Critical loads of acidity for forest soils and relationship to forest decline in the Northern Czech Republic. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 98: 363-379. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Bishop T., McBratney A. (2001): A comparison of prediction methods for the creation of field-extent soil property maps. Geoderma, 103: 149-160. Go to original source...
  3. Borůvka L., Mládková L., Drábek O. (2005): Factors controlling spatial distribution of soil acidification and Al forms in forest soils. Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry, 99: 1796-1806. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Borůvka L., Nikodem A., Drábek O., Vokurková P., Tejnecký V., Pavlů L. (2009): Assessment of soil aluminium pools along three mountainous elevation gradients. Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry, 103: 1449-1458. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Brus D.J., Kempen B., Heuvelink G.B.M. (2011): Sampling for validation of digital soil maps. European Journal of Soil Science, 62: 394-407. Go to original source...
  6. Deutsch C., Journel A. (1998): GSLIB: Geostatistical Software and User's Guide. 2nd Ed. Oxford University Press, New York.
  7. Hengl T., Heuvelink G., Stein A. (2004): A generic framework for spatial prediction of soil variables based on regressionkriging. Geoderma, 122: 75-93. Go to original source...
  8. Hengl T., Heuvelink G.B.M., Rossiter D.G. (2007): About regression-kriging: From equations to case studies. Computer & Geoscience, 33: 1301-1315. Go to original source...
  9. Hruška J., Ciencala E. (eds.) (2003): Long-Term Acidification and Nutrient Degradation of Forest Soils - Limiting Factors Forestry Today. Ministry of the Environment of the Czech Republic, Prague.
  10. Knotters M., Brus D.J., Oude Voshaar J.H. (1995): A comparison of kriging, co-kriging and kriging combined with regression for spatial interpolation of horizon depth with censored observations. Geoderma, 67: 227-246. Go to original source...
  11. Leopold U., Heuvelink G.B., Tiktak A., Finke P.A., Schoumans O. (2005): Accounting for change of support in spatial accuracy assessment of modelled soil mineral phosphorous concentration. Geoderma, 130: 368-386. Go to original source...
  12. Lopez-Granados, F., M. Jurado-Exposito, J. PenaBarragan, L. Garcia-Torres (2005): Using geostatistical and remote sensing approaches for mapping soil properties. European Journal of Agronomy, 23: 279-289. Go to original source...
  13. Mládková L., Borůvka L., Drábek O. (2004): Distribution of aluminium among its mobilizable forms in soils of the Jizera mountains region. Plant, Soil and Environment, 50: 346-351. Go to original source...
  14. Nikodem A., Kodešová R., Drábek O., Bubeníčková L., Borůvka L., Pavlů L., Tejnecký V. (2010): A numerical study of the impact of precipitation redistribution in a beech forest canopy on water and aluminum transport in a podzol. Vadose Zone Journal, 2: 238-251. Go to original source...
  15. Odeh I., McBratney A., Chittleborough D. (1995): Further results on prediction of soil properties from terrain attributes: heterotopic cokriging and regressionkriging. Geoderma, 67: 215-226. Go to original source...
  16. Oulehle F., Hruška J. (2005): Tree species (Picea abies and Fagus sylvatica) effects on soil water acidification and aluminium chemistry at sites subjected to long-term acidification in the Ore Mts., Czech Republic. Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry, 99: 1822-1829. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Oulehle F., Hofmeister J., Hruška J. (2007): Modelling of the long-term effect of tree species (Norway spruce and European beech) on soil acidification in the Ore Mountains. Ecological Modelling, 204: 359-371. Go to original source...
  18. Papritz A., Stein A. (1999): Spatial prediction by linear kriging. In: Stein A., van der Meer F., Gorte B. (eds): Spatial Statistics for Remote Sensing. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dodrecht, 83-113. Go to original source...
  19. Pebesma E.J. (2004): Multivariable geostatistics in S: the gstat package. Computers & Geosciences, 30: 683-691. Go to original source...
  20. Pospíšil F. (1981): Group- and fractional composition of the humus of different soils. In: Transactions 5th Int. Soil Science Conf. Vol. 1. Research Institute for Soil Improvement, Prague, 135-138.
  21. R Development Core Team (2011): R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. Available at http://www.R-project.org
  22. Reinds G. J., Posch M., Leemans R. (2009): Modelling recovery from soil acidification in European forests under climate change. Science of the Total Environment, 407: 5663-5673. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Tejnecký V., Bradová M., Borůvka L., Němeček K., Šebek O., Nikodem A., Zenáhlíková J., Rejzek J., Drábek O. (2013): Profile distribution and temporal changes of sulphate and nitrate contents and related soil properties under beech and spruce forests. Science of the Total Environment, 442: 165-171. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Wackernagel H. (1998): Multivariate Geostatistics: An Introduction with Applications. 2nd Ed. Springer, Berlin. Go to original source...
  25. Zhu Q., Lin H.S. (2010): Comparing ordinary kriging and regression kriging for soil properties in contrasting landscapes. Pedosphere, 20: 594-606. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.