Soil & Water Res., 2014, 9(2):83-89 | DOI: 10.17221/28/2013-SWR

Generalized calibration of the Hargreaves equation for evapotranspiration under different climate conditionsOriginal Paper

Jignesh PATEL1, Himanshu PATEL1, Chetan BHATT2
1 Nirma University, Ahmedabad, India
2 Vishwakarma Government Engineering College, Chandkheda, Ahmedabad, India

Accurate estimation of evapotranspiration (ETo) is a key factor in weather-based irrigation scheduling methods. To estimate ETo using the Hargreaves equation, just the data on the minimum and maximum temperature and solar radiation are required. However, this procedure cannot offer consistent accuracy for different climate conditions. To attain the accuracy, calibration of the equation constants (CHand EH) for different climate conditions have successfully been attempted by many researchers. Because these calibration procedures are lengthy and location-specific, there is a need of a generalized calibration method to make the Hargreaves equation more pertinent and effective. In this paper, fuzzy logic based calibration method for the Hargreaves equation is proposed and validated. The fuzzy inference system is developed to compute appropriate values of the constants CHand EH on the basis of past data on humidity and wind velocity of a selected location. The underlying relationship between weather conditions and the best values of the constants CHand EH are used to establish a fuzzy rule base. The performance of the method is checked at eight geographically different locations of India with diverse climate conditions. The Mean Absolute Error (MAE) in ETovalues estimated by the calibrated modified Hargreaves equation and the Penman-Monteith (PM) equation is in the range of 0.3220-1.0325. It is far more lower than if the error is calculated using the original Hargreaves equation. It confirms the correctness of the calibration method for different climate conditions.

Keywords: accurate estimation; fuzzy logic; irrigation scheduling

Published: June 30, 2014  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
PATEL J, PATEL H, BHATT C. Generalized calibration of the Hargreaves equation for evapotranspiration under different climate conditions. Soil & Water Res. 2014;9(2):83-89. doi: 10.17221/28/2013-SWR.
Download citation

References

  1. Alexandris S., Stricvic R., Petovic S. (2008): Comparative analysis of reference evapotranspiration from the surface of rainfed grass from cental Serbia, calculated by six empirical metods against Penman-Montieth formula. European Water, 21/22: 17-28.
  2. Andales A.A., Chávez J.L., Bauder T.A. (2011): Irrigation Scheduling: The Water Balance Approach. Colorado State University, Fort Collins.
  3. CROPWAT (2012): CROPWAT. Available at http://www.fao.org/nr/water/infores_databases_cropwat.html (accessed March 10, 2012).
  4. Dukes M.D., Scholberg J.M. (2005): Soil moisture controlled subsurface drip irrigation on sandy soils. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 21: 89-101. Go to original source...
  5. Fortes P., Platonov A., Pereira L. (2005): GISAREG - A GIS based irrigation scheduling simulation model to support improved water use. Agricultural Water Management, 77: 159-179. Go to original source...
  6. Fraiture C.D., Wichelns D. (2010): Satisfying future water demands for agriculture. Agricultural Water Management, 97: 502-511. Go to original source...
  7. Goldhamer D.A., Fereres E. (2004): Irrigation scheduling of almond trees with trunk diameter sensors. Irrigation Science, 23: 11-19. Go to original source...
  8. Hanson B.R., Orloff S., Peters D. (2000): Monitoring soil moisture helps refine irrigation management. California Agriculture, 54: 38-42. Go to original source...
  9. Hargreaves G. (1989): Accuracy of estimated reference crop evapotranspiration. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 115: 1000-1007. Go to original source...
  10. Hargreaves G.H., Allen R.G. (2003): History and evaluation of hargreaves evapotranspiration equation. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 129: 53-63. Go to original source...
  11. Jensen D.T., Hargreaves G.H., Temesgen B., Allan R.G. (1997): Computation of ETo under nonideal condition. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 123: 394-400. Go to original source...
  12. Jones H.G. (2004): Irrigation scheduling: advantages and pitfalls of plant-based methods. Journal of Experimental Botany, 55: 2427-2436. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Krugera E., Schmidta G., Bruckner U. (1999). Scheduling strawberry irrigation based upon tensiometer measurement and a climatic water balance model. Scientia Horticulturae, 81: 409-424. Go to original source...
  14. Leib B.G., Elliott T.V., Matthews G. (2001): WISE: a web-linked and producer oriented program for irrigation scheduling. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 33: 1-6. Go to original source...
  15. Martin S. (1993): CLIMWAT for CROPWAT: A climatic database for irrigation planning and management. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 116. FAO, Rome.
  16. Martinez C.J., Thepadia M. (2010): Estimating reference evapotranspiration with minimum data in Florida. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 136: 494-501. Go to original source...
  17. Mendicino G., Senatore A. (2012): Regionalization of the Hargreaves coefficient for the assesment of distributed reference evapotranspiration in Southern Italy. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 139: 50-55. Go to original source...
  18. Mohawesh O.E. (2011): Evaluation of evapotranspiration models for estimating daily reference evapotranspiration in arid and semiarid environments. Plant Soil and Environment, 57: 145-152. Go to original source...
  19. Naadimuthu G., Raju K.S., Lee E.S. (1999): A heuristic dynamic optimization algorithm for irrigation scheduling. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 30: 169-183. Go to original source...
  20. Playán E., Mateos L. (2004): Modernization and optimization of irrigation systems to increase water productivity. In: Proc. 4th Int. Crop Science Congress. Brisbane, 1-13.
  21. Ravazzani G., Corbari C., Morella S., Gianoli P., Mancini M. (2012): Modified Hargreaves-Samani equation for the assessment of reference evapotranspiration in Alpine River Basins. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 138: 592-599. Go to original source...
  22. Sharon Y., Bravdo B. (1998): Automated orchad irrigation based on monitoring tugor potential with leaf sensor. International Water and Irrigation Review, 18: 14-19.
  23. Steele D.D., Scherer T.F., Hopkins D.G., Tuscherer S., Wright J. (2010): Spreadsheet implementation of irrigation scheduling by the checkbook method for North Dakota and Minnesota. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 26: 983-995. Go to original source...
  24. Subburayan S., Murugappan A., Mohan S. (2011): Modified Hargreaves equation for estimation of ETo in a hot and humid location in Tamilnadu State, India. International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 3: 592-600.
  25. Tabari H., Talaee P.H. (2011): Local calibration of the Hargreaves and Priestley-Taylor equations for estimating reference evapotranspiration in arid and cold climates of Iran based on the Penman-Monteith Model. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 16: 837-845. Go to original source...
  26. Vanderlinden K., Giráldez J.V., Meirvenne M.V. (2004): Assessing reference evapotranspiration by the Hargreaves method in Southern Spain. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 130: 184-191. Go to original source...
  27. Xu B., Dale D.S., Huang Y. (2002): Cotton color classification by fuzzy logic. Textile Research Journal, 72: 504-509. Go to original source...
  28. Yoder R.E., Odhiambo L.O., Wright W.C. (2005): Evalution of methods for estimating daily reference crop evaporanspiration at a site in the humid southeast United States. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 21: 197-202. Go to original source...
  29. Zadeh L. (1965): Fuzzy sets. Informatioion and Control, 8: 338-353. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.