Soil & Water Res., 2014, 9(2):90-96 | DOI: 10.17221/54/2013-SWR

Influence of drainage system maintenance on storm runoff from a reforested, waterlogged mountain catchmentOriginal Paper

Vladimír Černohous1, Vladimír Švihla2, František Šach1, Dušan Kacálek1
1 Forestry and Game Management Research Institute, Opočno Research Station, Opočno, Czech Republic
2 Beroun, Czech Republic

The maintenance of a drainage system in a waterlogged mountain catchment impacted by earlier harvesting operations was assessed on the basis of a hydrological analysis (hydrological balance, three linear reservoirs method). To restore pre-harvest hydrological conditions, the water-saturated localities were experimentally drained both by restoration of existing ditches and digging of additional open ditches. The rainwater retention of the soil was illustrated by two comparable storm flow events occurring before and after the draining treatment. Pedohydrological analysis revealed the important involvement of static retention in capillary pores in the rainfall-runoff process during rainstorm events. Restoration and addition of the drainage system yield more favourable generation and better proportioned distribution of storm flow discharge. There would be no danger of water depletion in the catchment during dry periods in connection with the draining treatment. In comparison with the state before drainage system maintenance, the static retention after draining treatment became greater than zero. Both the dynamic retention (detention) and static retention helped balancing storm flows in terms of flood and drought control. The successive drop of the raised water table level following drainage system maintenance resulted in changes of actual retention and subsequent runoff. The drainage procedure proved its positive influence on reforestation and the environment, as no negative impact on soil and stream hydrology was found.

Keywords: drainage treatment; forest soil; mountain catchment; storm flow runoff; waterlogging; water retention

Published: June 30, 2014  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Černohous V, Švihla V, Šach F, Kacálek D. Influence of drainage system maintenance on storm runoff from a reforested, waterlogged mountain catchment. Soil & Water Res. 2014;9(2):90-96. doi: 10.17221/54/2013-SWR.
Download citation

References

  1. Aust W.M., Reisinger T.W., Burger J.A., Stokes B.J. (1993): Soil physical and hydrological changes associated with logging a wet pine flat with wide-tired skidders. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry, 17: 22-25. Go to original source...
  2. Aust W.M, Tippett M.D., Burger J.A., McKee W.H. (1995): Compaction and rutting during harvesting affect better drained soils more than poorly drained soils on wet pine flats. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry, 19: 72-77. Go to original source...
  3. Badoux A., Jeisy M., Kienholz H., Luscher P., Weingartner R., Witzig J., Hegg Ch. (2006): Influence of storm damage on the runoff generation in two sub-catchments of the Sperbelgraben, Swiss Emmental. European Journal of Forest Research, 125: 27-41. Go to original source...
  4. Brandt M., Bergström S., Gardelin M. (1988): Modelling the effects of clearcutting on runoff - examples from central Sweden. Ambio, 17: 307-313.
  5. Beheim E. (2006): The effect of peat land drainage and afforestation on runoff dynamics, consequences of floods in the Glomma River. In: Krecek J., Haigh M. (eds): Environmental Role of Wetlands in Headwaters. Springer, Dordrecht, 59-75. Go to original source...
  6. Černohous V., Kovář P. (2009): Forest watershed runoff changes determined using the unit hydrograph method. Journal of Forest Science, 55: 89-95. Go to original source...
  7. Černohous V., Šach F., Kacálek D. (2010): Effects of drainage treatment and stand growth on changes in runoff components from a forested watershed. Journal of Forest Science, 56: 307-313. Go to original source...
  8. De Zeeuw J.W. (1973): Hydrograph analysis for areas with mainly groundwater runoff. In: Drainage Principles and Applications. University of Agriculture, International Institute for Land Reclamation and Improvement, Wageningen, 321-358.
  9. Eisenbies M.H., Aust W.M., Burger J.A., Adams M.B. (2007): Forest operations, extreme flooding events, and considerations for hydrologic modeling in the Appalachians-A review. Forest Ecology and Management, 242: 77-98. Go to original source...
  10. Heikurainen L., Päivänen J. (1970): The effect of thinning, clear cutting and fertilization on the hydrology of peatland drained for forestry. Acta Forestalia Fennica, 104: 23. Go to original source...
  11. Hewlett J.D. (1982): Principles of Forest Hydrology. University of Georgia, Athens.
  12. Holden J., Chapman P.J., Labadz J.C. (2004): Artificial drainage of peatlands: hydrological and hydrochemical process and wetland restoration. Progress in Physical Geography, 28: 95-123. Go to original source...
  13. Holko L., Kostka Z., Šanda M. (2011): Assessment of frequency and areal extent of overland flow generation in a forested mountain catchment. Soil and Water Research, 6: 43-53. Go to original source...
  14. Chow V.T., Maidment D.R., Mays L.W. (1988): Applied Hydrology. McGraw-Hill, New York.
  15. Joensuu S., Ahti E., Vuollekoski M. (1999): The effects of peatland forest ditch maintenance on suspended solids in runoff. Boreal Environment Research, 4: 343-355.
  16. Joensuu S., Ahti E., Vuollekoski M. (2002): Effects of ditch network maintenance on the chemistry of run-off water from peatland forests. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 17: 238-247. Go to original source...
  17. Kulhavý Z., Kovář P. (2000): Using Models of Hydrological Balance for Small Catchments. Research Institute for Soil and Water Conservation, Prague. (in Czech)
  18. Linsley R.K., Kohler M.A., Paulhus J.L.H. (1982): Hydrology for Engineers. 3rd Ed. McGraw Hill, New York.
  19. Lundin L. (1994): Impacts of forest drainage on flow regime. Studia Forestalia Suecia, 192: 1-22.
  20. Novák V. (1954): Water in soil - soil water regime. In: Klika J., Novák V., Gregor A. et al. (eds): Methods Manual for Phytosociology, Ecology, Climatology and Pedology. Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences, Prague, 440-484. (in Czech)
  21. Robinson M. (1986): Changes in catchment runoff following drainage and afforestation. Journal of Hydrology, 86: 71-84. Go to original source...
  22. Robinson M., Cognard-Plancq A.L., Cosandey C., David J., Durand P., Führer H.W., Hall R., Hendriques M.O., Marc V., McCarthy R., McDonell M., Martin C., Nisbet T., O'Dea P., Rodgers M., Zollner A. (2003): Studies of the impact of forests on peak flows and baseflows: a European perspective. Forest Ecology and Management, 186: 85-97. Go to original source...
  23. Starr M.R., Päivänen J. (1986): Runoff response to peatland forest drainage in Finland: a synthesis. In: Gessel S.P. (eds): Forest Site and Productivity. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht, 43-50. Go to original source...
  24. Sun G., McNulty S.G., Shepard J.P., Amatya D.V., Riekerk H., Comerford N.B., Skaggs W., Swift L. (2001): Effects of timber management on the hydrology of wetland forests in the southern United States. Forest Ecology and Management 143: 227-236. Go to original source...
  25. Weiler M., McDonnell J.J. (2004): Water storage and movement. In: Burley J., Evans J., Youngquist J.A. (eds): Encyclopedia of Forest Sciences. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1253-1260. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.