Soil & Water Res., 2014, 9(4):214-223 | DOI: 10.17221/227/2014-SWR

The evaluation of degraded land by application of the contingent methodOriginal Paper

Jaroslava JANKŮ, Dagmar KUČEROVÁ, Jakub HOUŠKA, Josef KOZÁK, Adéla RUBEŠOVÁ
Department of Soil Science and Soil Protection, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Recources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic

Industrial activities in the Czech Republic have brought into existence many degraded and contaminated sites. Such areas are not suitable for farming, building or recreation purposes. The necessary reclamation is typically very expansive. In this study, the contingent valuation method (CVM) was used to estimate the public's willingness to pay for soil reclamation, and also to find out the desire of habitants to live in a good environment with respect to soil quality, and generally to improve the publics awarness of soil protection. This study can help to improve understanding of the local public willingness to pay for reclamation of degradated land protection and can provide useful information for an effective land protection programme. The study was carried out on the locality of Březové Hory - a part of the old mining town Příbram. The chosen locality was used for the placement and storage of residual material after mining, but also includes different soils, which have been transported here as useless material. After the reclamation of a part of the locality, a forest park has been established. A random questionnaire survey was conducted with local resident and as well as holiday makers. The results of the survey indicated that protection of cultivated land was important to the local public. The mean willingness to contribute to reclamation of degraded and contaminated lands in Březové Hory was expressed as the following amount of money: 36.64 CZK (1.4 €) per habitant. The findings calculated suggested that the costs of reclamation of landfill soils on Březové Hory totaled 1528 CZK/m2. The results of the survey also showed that the willingness to pay increased according to the dependence on income, the gender and also residential address of respondents. The results have not confirmed the dependence on education. In order to increase the hypothetical willingness to pay, an increase of public awareness of soil degradation and harmful effects on the environment is necessary. Furthermore, it was shown that the market valuation of land can not be used for soil protection purposes.

Keywords: contingent valuation method (CVM); land evaluation; land protection; land reclamation; public awareness of soil protection; willingness to pay

Published: December 31, 2014  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
JANKŮ J, KUČEROVÁ D, HOUŠKA J, KOZÁK J, RUBEŠOVÁ A. The evaluation of degraded land by application of the contingent method. Soil & Water Res. 2014;9(4):214-223. doi: 10.17221/227/2014-SWR.
Download citation

References

  1. Bishop R., Heberlein A. (1979): Measuring values of extramarket goods: Are indirect measures biased? American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 61: 926-930. Go to original source...
  2. Buckley C., Rensburg T.M., Hynes S. (2009). Recreational demand farm common age in Ireland: A contingent valuation assessment. Land Use Policy, 26: 846-854. Go to original source...
  3. Chang K., Ying Y.H. (2005): External benefits of preserving agricultural land: Taiwan's rice fields. The Social Science Journal, 42: 285-293. Go to original source...
  4. Czech Statistical Office (2012): Characteristic of Příbram District. Available at http://www.czso.cz/xs/redakce.nsf/i/charakteristika_okresu_pribram (accessed December 12, 2013). (in Czech)
  5. Diamo (2013): Pribram-Březové Hory - Sanitation. Available at http://www.bhsanace.spravcestavby.cz (accessed January 29, 2014). (in Czech)
  6. Dorfman J.H., Barnett B.J., Bergstrom J.C., Lavigno B. (2008): Searching for farmland preservation markets: Evidence from the southeastern U.S. Land Use Policy, 26: 121-129. Go to original source...
  7. García-Llorente M., Martín-Ló B., Montes C. (2011a): Exploring the motivations of protesters in contingent valuation: Insights for conservation policies. Environmental Science & Policy, 14: 76-88. Go to original source...
  8. García-Llorente M., Martín-López B., Nunes P.A.L.D., González J.A., Alcorlo P., Montes C. (2011b): Analyzing the social factors that influence willingness to pay for the management of invasive alien species under two different strategies: Eradication and prevention. Environmental Management, 48: 418-435. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Hackl A.F., Pruckner G.J. (1997): Towards more efficient compensation pro-grammes for tourists' benefits from agriculture in Europe. Environmental and Resource Economics, 10: 189-205. Go to original source...
  10. Hanemann W.M. (1984): Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 66: 332-341. Go to original source...
  11. Hideo A., Kazuo S., Hiroshi O. (2006): Contingent valuation approach in measuringthe multifunctionality of agriculture and rural areas in Japan. Paddy and Water Environment, 4: 217-222. Go to original source...
  12. Janků J. (1987): Heavy Metals in Soils. [Diploma Thesis.] VŠZ, Prague. (in Czech)
  13. Jin J., Wang Z., Liu X. (2008): Valuing black-faced spoon bill conservation in Macao: A policy and contingent valuation study. Ecological Economics, 68: 328-335. Go to original source...
  14. Jin J., Jiang C., Li L. (2013): The economic valuation of cultivated land protection: A contingent valuation study in Wenling City, China. Landscape and Urban Planning, 119: 158-164. Go to original source...
  15. Loomis J.B., Larson D.M. (1994): Total economic values of increasing gray whale populations: Results from a contingent valuation survey of visitors and house-holds. Marine Resource Economics, 9: 275-286. Go to original source...
  16. Mitchell R.C., Carson R.T. (1989): Using Surveys to Value Public Goods. The Contingent Valuation Method. Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C.
  17. Kučerová D. (2014): The Value of Land in the Region. [Diploma Thesis.] ČZU, Prague. (in Czech)
  18. Pruckner G.J. (1995): Agricultural landscape cultivation in Austria: An application of the CVM. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 22: 173-190. Go to original source...
  19. Rieuwerts J., Farago M., Cikrt M., Bencko V. (1999): Heavy metal concentrations in and around households near a secondary lead smelter. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 58: 317-335. Go to original source...
  20. Seják J., Kokoška J. Pulkrab K., Šišák L. (1999): Evaluation of Land and Natural Resources. Grada Publishing. Prague. (in Czech)
  21. Trojáček P., Trantinová M. (1999): The Contamination of Agricultural Soil by Heavy Metals in the Příbram Region. Ekotoxa, Opava. (In Czech)
  22. Uzochukwu B., Uguru N., Ezeoke U., Onwujekwe O., Sibeudu T. (2011): Voluntary counseling and testing (VCT) for HIV/AIDS: A study of the knowledge, awarenessand willingness to pay for VCT among students in tertiary institutions in Enugu State Nigeria. Health Policy, 99: 277-284. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.