Soil & Water Res., 2016, 11(3):155-162 | DOI: 10.17221/40/2016-SWR

Estimation of land loss in the Czech Republic in the near futureOriginal Paper

Jaroslava JANKŮ, Ondřej JAK©ÍK, Josef KOZÁK, Adéla Marie MARHOUL
Department of Soil Science and Soil Protection, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic

The study presents an estimate of how many hectares of soil will be removed from the farmland fund in the coming years around the biggest towns for non-agricultural use, such as for residential purposes and industrial zones. To estimate suburban area spreading, so called "buffers", i.e. packing zones around towns, were established. For the capital city of Prague the buffer width was set at 3 km, for regional towns at 2 km, and for district towns at 1 km. In this area, as well as on the territory (intravilan) of towns, the estimate of the future acreage removal of farmland for building purposes was calculated. The study also quantifies the changes in acreage of different soil types. The results show a significant decrease in acreage of the best quality soils, primarily because the largest towns are usually built on the best soils, and these towns are spreading much more than small towns. The results were statistically processed for (a) total, (b) each regional town, (c) each district town, and (d) total always separately for urban areas, for suburban areas (buffer zones), and for their combinations. Cambisols represent the soil group with the largest loss of land, followed by Luvisols and Chernosols.

Keywords: land consumption; land protection; land take; soil sealing; suburban areas; urban areas

Published: September 30, 2016  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
JANKŮ J, JAK©ÍK O, KOZÁK J, MARHOUL AM. Estimation of land loss in the Czech Republic in the near future. Soil & Water Res. 2016;11(3):155-162. doi: 10.17221/40/2016-SWR.
Download citation

References

  1. Anonymous (2012): Soil in the City. Urban Soil Management Strategy. Stuttgart, Department for Environmental Protection.
  2. Antrop M. (2000): Background concepts for integrated landscape analysis. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 77: 17-28. Go to original source...
  3. Artmann M. (2014a): Institutional efficiency of urban soil sealing management - from raising awareness to better implementation of sustainable development in Germany. Landscape and Urban Planning, 131: 83-95. Go to original source...
  4. Artmann M. (2014b): Assessment of soil sealing management responses, strate-gies and targets towards ecologically sustainable urban land use management. Ambio, 43: 530-541. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Bouma J., McBratney A.B. (2013): Framing soils as an actor when dealing with wicked environmental problems. Geoderma, 200-201: 130-139. Go to original source...
  6. EEA (2014): Corine Land Cover 2006 Seamless Vector Data (Version 17/2013). Copenhagen, European Environmental Agency.
  7. European Commission (2012): Guidelines on Best Practice to Limit, Mitigate or Com-pensate Soil Sealing. Luxembourg, European Union.
  8. Eurostat (2010): Regional Population Projections. Statistics in focus 1/2010. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3433488/5564440/KS-SF-10-001-EN.PDF/d5b8bf54-6979-4834-998a-f7d1a61aa82d
  9. Federal Environmental Agency (2010): Information 26 October 2010. Increase in Settlement and Transport Areas between 1993 and 2009. Available at http://www.umweltbundesamt.de/rup/veroeffentlichungen/zunahme.pdf
  10. Gardi C., Panagos P., Bosco C., de Brogniez D. (2011): Soil Sealing, Land Take and Food Security: Impact Assessment of Land Take in the Production of the Agricultural Sector in Europe. Ispra, JRC.
  11. Gayda S. et al. (2005): SCATTER: Sprawling Cities and Transport: from Evalutation to Recommendations [Final Report.] London, Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis, University College London.
  12. Harris R. (2015): Suburbanization and Suburbanism. In: Wright J (ed.): International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. 2nd Ed. Oxford, Elsevier: 660-666. Go to original source...
  13. Herrick J.E. (2000): Soil quality: an indicator of sustainable land management? Applied Soil Ecology, 15: 75-83. Go to original source...
  14. Janků J., Sekáč P., Baráková J., Kozák J. (2016): An analysis of land in terms of protection of farmland. Soil and Water Research, 11: 20-28. Go to original source...
  15. Kozák J., Němeček J., Borůvka L., Kodeąová R., Janků J., Jacko J., Hladík J. (2010): Soil Atlas of the Czech Republic. Prague, CULS.
  16. Mitchell D., Enemark S., Van der Molen P. (2015): Climate resilient urban development: Why responsible land governance is important. Land Use Policy, 48: 190-198. Go to original source...
  17. Němeček J., Muhlhanselová M., Macků J., Vokoun J., Vavříček D., Novák P. (2011): The Czech taxonomic soil classification system. Prague, CULS. (in Czech)
  18. Nizeyimana E.L., Petersen G.W., Imhoff M.L., Sinclair Jr., H.R.,Waltman S.W., Reed- Margetan D.S., Levine E.R., Russo J.M. (2001): Assessing the impact of land conversion to urban use on soils with different productivity levels in the USA. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 65: 391-402. Go to original source...
  19. Nuissl H., Schroeter-Schlaack C. (2009): On the economic approach to the con-tainment of land consumption. Environmental Science and Policy, 12: 270-280. Go to original source...
  20. Prokop G., Jobstmann H., Schönbauer A. (2011): Overview on best practices for limiting soil sealing and mitigating its effects in EU-27 [Technical Report-2011-050.] Available at http://ec.europa.eu/environment/soil/sealing.htm
  21. Rodríguez P.M., González M.E.P. (2007): Changes in soil sealing in Guadalajara (Spain): Cartography with LANDSAT images. Science of the Total Environment, 378: 209-213. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Smith P., House J.I., Bustamante M., Sobocká J., Harper R., Pan G., West P.C., Clark J.M., Adhya T., Rumpel C., Paustian K., Kuikman P., Cotrufo M.F., Elliott J.A., McDowell R., Griffiths R.I., Asakawa S., Bondeau A., Jain A.K., Meersmans J., Pugh T.A.M. (2016): Global change pressures on soils from land use and management. Global Change Biology, 22: 1008-1028. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Stachura J., Chuman T., ©efrna L. (2015): Development of soil consumption driven by urbanization and pattern of built-up areas in Prague periphery since the 19th century. Soil and Water Research, 10: 252-261. Go to original source...
  24. Torrens P.M., Alberti M. (2000): Measuring Sprawl. CASA Working Paper 27. London, Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis, University College London.
  25. Van den Daele W., Krohn W. (1998): Experimental implementation as a linking mechanism in the process of innovation. Research Policy, 27: 853-868. Go to original source...
  26. Wang H., Zhang X., Skitmore M. (2015): Implications for sustainable land use in high-density cities: Evidence from Hong Kong. Habitat International, 50: 23-34. Go to original source...
  27. Xu G., Huang X., Zhong T., Chen Y., Wu C., Jin Y. (2015): Assessment on the effect of city arable land protection under the implementation of China's National General Land Use Plan (2006-2020). Habitat International, 49: 466-473. Go to original source...
  28. Zhang X., Chen J., Tan M., Sun Y. (2007): Assessing the impact of urban sprawl on soil resources of Nanjing city using satellite images and digital soil databases. Catena, 69: 16-30. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.