Soil & Water Res., 2018, 13(1):1-10 | DOI: 10.17221/283/2014-SWR

Investigation of soil water infiltration at a scale of individual earthworm channelsOriginal Paper

Igor PELͩEK*
Department of Hydrology and Water Protection, Research Institute for Soil and Water Conservation, Pardubice, Czech Republic

This study focused on the hydraulic efficiency of vertical earthworm channels (henceforth referred to as macropores or channels). The parameters selected for investigation were the rate of change in hydraulic soil conductivity in the channel walls due to compaction, the rate of this compaction, and the wall stability against running and stagnant water. We preferentially tested the variants for infiltration of water flowing from the soil horizons against gravity (e.g. from the level of installation of tile and controlled drainage). The details of influx and infiltration processes were examined both in the field and more thoroughly in the laboratory using an accurate continuous infiltrometer constructed at the Research Institute for Soil and Water Conservation (RISWC), Czech Republic. Both direct measurements and indirect evidence consisted of tests of individual natural macropores directly in the field, as well as tests of intact collected samples and artificial samples with variants of natural, artificially extruded, and cut out tubular macropores. We studied the processes occurring in macropores with diameters of ca. 5 mm and larger. In these particular conditions, we identified the apparent saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ks') of the soil horizons (including macropore-mediated vertical surface infiltration and preferential flow to soil followed by radial infiltration) most frequent as Ki (apparent saturated hydraulic conductivity affected by preferential flow or influx of water) from 50 to 200 cm/h. In some cases, saturated hydraulic conductivity of earthworm channel walls (Ksw) was reduced in the order of tens of percent compared with matrix Ks. The increase of bulk density of soil (ρd) in the macropore vicinity reached the maximum of 25%. The intensity of macropore wall erosion (ier) ranged from 0 to 70 mg/min/dm2.

Keywords: effect of radial compaction; efficiency of earthworm channels; macropore infiltration; preferential flow; soil macropore vicinity

Published: March 31, 2018  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
PELÍ©EK I. Investigation of soil water infiltration at a scale of individual earthworm channels. Soil & Water Res. 2018;13(1):1-10. doi: 10.17221/283/2014-SWR.
Download citation

References

  1. Bastardie F., Capowiez Y., De Dreuzy J.R., Cluzeau D. (2003): X-ray tomographic and hydraulic characterization of burrowing by three earthworm species in repacked soil cores. Applied Soil Ecology, 24: 3-16. Go to original source...
  2. Capowiez Y., Bottinelli N., Jouquet P. (2014): Quantitative estimates of burrow construction and destruction, byanecic and endogeic earthworms in repacked soil cores. Applied Soil Ecology, 74: 46-50. Go to original source...
  3. Conacher A.J., Dalrymple J.B. (1977): The nine unit landsurface model and pedogeomorphic research. Gedoderma, 18: 127-144. Go to original source...
  4. Dorgan K.M., Jumars P.A., Johnson B.D., Boudreau B.P. (2006): Macrofaunal burrowing: the medium is the message. In: Gibson R.N. et al. (eds): Oceanography and Marine Biology: An Annual Review No. 44. London, Taylor & Francis: 85-121. Go to original source...
  5. Edwards W.M., Van Der Ploeg R.R., Ehlers W. (1979): A numerical study of the effects of noncapillary-sized pores upon infiltration. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 43: 851-856. Go to original source...
  6. FAO (2014): World Reference Base for Soil Resources. Rome, FAO.
  7. Karaca A. (ed.) (2011): Biology of Earthworms. Heidelberg, Springer. Go to original source...
  8. Kulhavý Z., Èmelík M., Pelí¹ek I. (2014): The set of the infiltrometer and permeameter with a metering pump. The patent No. 305517 and utility model UV 26615. Prague, RISWC (in Czech)
  9. Mika Z. (1959): The question of the mole drainage lifetime. Lesnictví (Forestry), 5: 427-442. (in Czech)
  10. Novák V., Ká¹ V., Nosek J. (1959): Soil Biota (Edaphon). Prague, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences. (in Czech)
  11. Philip J.R. (1969): Theory of infiltration. In: Chow V.T. (ed.): Advances in Hydroscience, Vol. 5. New York, Academic Press: 215-296. Go to original source...
  12. Pi¾l V. (2002): Earthworms of the Czech Republic. Sborník Pøírodovìdného klubu v Uherském Hradi¹ti. Supplementum No. 9/2002. Uherské Hradi¹tì, Society for Natural Science. (In Czech)
  13. Rogasik H., Schrader S., Onasch I., Kiesel J., Gerke H.H. (2014): Micro-scale dry bulk density variation around earthworm (Lumbricus terrestris L.) burrows based on X-ray computed tomography. Geoderma, 213: 471-477. Go to original source...
  14. Schrader S., Rogasik H., Onasch I., Jégou D. (2007): Assessment of soil structural differentiation around earthworm burrows by means of X-ray computed tomography and scanning electron microscopy. Geoderma, 137: 378-387. Go to original source...
  15. Urbánek J., Dole¾al F. (1992): Review of some case studies on the abundance and on the hydraulic efficiency of earthworm channels in Czechoslovak soils, with reference to the subsurface pipe drainage. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 24: 1193-1773. Go to original source...
  16. Va¹kù Z. (2008): Basic Types of Surveys for the Landscape Management, Use and Protection. Prague, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague. (in Czech)

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.