Soil & Water Res., 2018, 13(4):226-233 | DOI: 10.17221/218/2016-SWR

Measurement and computation of kinetic energy of simulated rainfall in comparison with natural rainfallOriginal Paper

Jan PETRŮ*, Jana KALIBOVÁ
Department of Land Use and Improvement, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic

Rainfall characteristics such as total amount and rainfall intensity (I) are important inputs in calculating the kinetic energy (KE) of rainfall. Although KE is a crucial indicator of the raindrop potential to disrupt soil aggregates, it is not a routinely measured meteorological parameter. Therefore, KE is derived from easily accessible variables, such as I, in empirical laws. The present study examines whether the equations which had been derived to calculate KE of natural rainfall are suitable for the calculation of KE of simulated rainfall. During the experiment presented in this paper, the measurement of rainfall characteristics was carried out under laboratory conditions using a rainfall simulator. In total, 90 measurements were performed and evaluated to describe the rainfall intensity, drop size distribution and velocity of rain drops using the Thies laser disdrometer. The duration of each measurement of rainfall event was 5 minutes. Drop size and fall velocity were used to calculate KE and to derive a new equation of time-specific kinetic energy (KEtime - I). When comparing the newly derived equation for KE of simulated rainfall with the six most commonly used equations for KEtime - I of natural rainfall, KE of simulated rainfall was discovered to be underestimated. The higher the rainfall intensity, the higher the rate of underestimation. KE of natural rainfall derived from theoretical equations exceeded KE of simulated rainfall by 53-83% for I = 30 mm/h and by 119-275% for I = 60 mm/h. The underestimation of KE of simulated rainfall is probably caused by smaller drops formed by the rainfall simulator at higher intensities (94% of all drops were smaller than 1 mm), which is not typical of natural rainfall.

Keywords: disdrometer; drop size distribution; rainfall intensity; rainfall simulator

Published: December 31, 2018  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
PETRŮ J, KALIBOVÁ J. Measurement and computation of kinetic energy of simulated rainfall in comparison with natural rainfall. Soil & Water Res. 2018;13(4):226-233. doi: 10.17221/218/2016-SWR.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Angulo-Martínez M., Barros A.P.O.D. (2015): Measurement uncertainty in rainfall kinetic energy and intensity relationships for soil erosion studies: An evaluation using PARSIVEL disdrometers in the Southern Appalachian Mountains. Geomorphology, 228: 28-40. Go to original source...
    2. Assoulinea S., El Idrissib A., Persoons E. (1997): Modelling the physical characteristics of simulated rainfall: a comparison with natural rainfall. Journal of Hydrology, 266: 336-447. Go to original source...
    3. Blum W.E.H., Warkentin B.P., Frossard E. (2006): Soil, human society and the environment. Geological Society, Special Publication, 266: 1-8. Go to original source...
    4. Bubenzer G.D. (1979): Rainfall characteristics important for simulation. In: Proc. Rainfall Simulator Workshop, Tuscon, March 7-9, 1979, U.S. Department of Agriculture Science and Education Administration Agricultural Reviews and Manuals, ARM -W-10/July1979.
    5. Cerdà A., Ibáñez S., Calvo A. (1997): Design and operation of small and portable rainfall simulator for rugged terrain. Soil Technology, 11: 161-168. Go to original source...
    6. Clarke M.A., Walsh R.P.D. (2007): A portable rainfall simulator for field assessment of splash and slopewash in remote locations. Earth Surface Processes Landforms, 32: 2052-2069. Go to original source...
    7. Dunkerley D. (2008): Rain event properties in nature and in rainfall simulation experiments: a comparative review with recommendations for increasingly systematic study and reporting. Hydrological Processes, 22: 4415-4435. Go to original source...
    8. Esteves M., Planchon O., Lapetite J.M., Silvera N., Cadet P. (2000): The "EMIRE" large rainfall simulator: design and field testing. Earth Surface Processes Landforms, 25: 681-690. Go to original source...
    9. Fernandéz-Raga M., Fraile R., Keizer J.J., Teijeiro M.E.V., Castro A., Palencia C., Calvo A.I., Koenders J., Marques R.L.C. (2010): The kinetic energy of rain measured with an optical disdrometer: An application to splash erosion. Atmospheric Research, 96: 225-240. Go to original source...
    10. Fister W., Iserloh T., Ries J.B., Schmidt R.G. (2012): A portable wind and rainfall simulator for in situ soil erosion measurements. Catena, 91: 72-84. Go to original source...
    11. Fornis R.L., Vermeulen H.R., Nieuwenhuis J.D. (2005): Kinetic energy-rainfall intensity relationship for Central Cebu, Philippines for soil erosion studies. Journal of Hydrology, 300: 20-32. Go to original source...
    12. Frasson R.P.M., Cunha L.K., Krajewski W.K. (2011): Assessment of the Thies optical disdrometer performance. Atmospheric Research, 101: 237-255. Go to original source...
    13. Hudson N.W. (1965): The influence of rainfall mechanics on soil erosion. [Ph.D. Thesis.] Cape Town, University of Cape Town.
    14. Humphrey J.B., Daniel T.C., Edwards D.R., Sharpley A.N. (2002): A portable rainfall simulator for plot-scale runoff studies. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 18: 199-204. Go to original source...
    15. Iserloh T., Fister W., Seeger M., Willger H., Ries J.B. (2012): A small portable rainfall simulator for reproducible experiments on soil erosion. Soil & Tillage Research, 124: 131-137. Go to original source...
    16. Iserloh T., Ries J.B., Arnáez J., Boix-Fayos C., Butzen V., Cerdà A., Echeverría M.T., Fernández-Gálvez J., Fister W., Geißler C., Gómez J.A., Gómez-Macpherson H., Kuhn N.J., Lázaro R., León F.J., Martínez-Mena M., MatrínezMurillo J.F., Marze M., Mingorance M.D., Ortigosa L., Peters P., Regüé D., Ruiz-Sinoga J.D., Scholten T., Seeger M., Solé-Benet A., Wengel R., Wirtz S. (2013): European small portable rainfall simulator: A comparison of rainfall chracteristics. Catena, 110: 100-112. Go to original source...
    17. Jayawardena A.W., Rezaur R.B. (2000): Drop size distribution and kinetic energy load of rainstorms in Hong Kong. Hydrological Processes, 14: 1069-1082. Go to original source...
    18. McIsaac G.F. (1990): Apparent geographic and atmospheric influences on raindrop sizes and rainfall kinetic energy. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 45: 663-666.
    19. Meyer L., McCune D.L. (1958): Rainfall simulator for runoff plots. Agricultural Engineering, 39: 644-648.
    20. Petan S., Rusjan S., Vidmar A., Mikoš M. (2010): The rainfall kinetic energy-intensity relationship for rainfall erosivity estimation in the mediterranean part of Slovenia. Journal of Hydrology, 391: 314-321. Go to original source...
    21. Ries J.B., Seeger M., Iserloh T., Wistorf S., Fister W. (2009): Calibration of simulated rainfall characteristics for the study of soil erosion on agricultural land. Soil & Tillage Research, 106: 109-116. Go to original source...
    22. Rosewell C.J. (1986): Rainfall kinetic energy in eastern Australia. Journal of Climate and Applied Meteorology, 25: 1695-1701. Go to original source...
    23. Salles Ch., Poesen J., Sempere-Torres D. (2002): Kinetic energy of rain and its functional relationship with intensity. Journal of Hydrology, 257: 256-270. Go to original source...
    24. Sanchez-Moreno J.F., Mannaerts Ch.M., Jetten V., LöfflerMang M. (2012): Rainfall kinetic energy-intensity and rainfall momentum-intensity relationships for Cape Verde. Journal of Hydrology, 454-455: 131-140. Go to original source...
    25. Shelton C.H., von Bernuth R.D., Rajbhandari S.P. (1985): A continuous-application rainfall simulator. Transactions of the ASAE, 28: 1115-1119. Go to original source...
    26. Steiner M., Smith J.A. (2000): Reflectivity, rain rate, and kinetic energy flux relationships based on raindrop spectra. Journal of Climate and Applied Meteorology, 39: 1923-1940. Go to original source...
    27. Thies (2004): Instruction for use 021341/07/11 Laser Precipitation Monitor 5.4110.xx.x00 V2.5x STD. Göttingen, Adolf Thies GmbH & Co KG.
    28. Thomas N.P., El Swaify S.A. (1989): Construction and calibration of rainfall simulator. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 43: 1-9. Go to original source...
    29. Van Dijk A.M. (2002): Rainfall intensity-kinetic energy relationship: a critical literature appraisal. Journal of Hydrology, 261: 1-23. Go to original source...
    30. Wischmeier W.H., Smith D.D. (1978): Predicting Rainfall Erosion Losses - a Guide to Conservation Planning. USDA Agricultural Research Service Handbook No. 537, Hyattsville, USDA.
    31. Zanchi C., Torri D. (1980): Evalution of rainfall energy in central Italy. In: De Boodt M., Gabriels D. (eds.): Assessment of Erosion. Toronto, Wiley: 133-142.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content