Soil & Water Res., 2020, 15(2):125-134 | DOI: 10.17221/20/2019-SWR

Responses of soil microorganisms to land use in different soil types along the soil profilesOriginal Paper

Erika Gömöryová*,1, Gabriela Barančíková2, Erika Tobiašová3, Ján Halás2, Rastislav Skalský2, Štefan Koco2, Dušan Gömöry1
1 Faculty of Forestry, Technical University in Zvolen, Zvolen, Slovakia
2 National Agriculture and Food Centre, Soil Science and Conservation Research Institute, Bratislava, Slovakia
3 Department of Soil Science, Slovak University of Agriculture, Nitra, Slovakia

The objective of this study was to find out how land use affects the soil microbial attributes in different soil types and to which depth. The study was performed in Slovakia (Europe) in three areas differing in soil type (Chernozem, Stagnosol, Cambisol). Within each area, three localities with different land use (forest, grassland, cropland), representing a gradient with different intensity of management, were chosen. The soil samples were taken along a single soil profile up to a depth of 1 m with 10 cm increments at each locality. In the soil samples, the basic soil chemical properties and microbial attributes were determined. The effect of the land use on the microbial biomass and basal respiration was mainly observed in the Chernozem in the top 30 cm, while in the Stagnosol, no difference in the trend in the microbial biomass between the different ecosystems along the soil profile was found. The N-mineralisation reflected the different management practices especially in the Cambisol in the top 20 cm. The most distinct differences in the catalase activity between the soils differing in land use were found in the Cambisol along the whole profile. The richness and diversity of the functional groups did not differ significantly between the soils with the different land use and also no uniform responses of the functional groups composition to the land use were observed. The microbial biomass and activity were mainly affected by the amount of the soil organic matter; the intensity of the impact differed according to the soil type.

Keywords: cropland; forest; grassland; microbial community; soil types

Published: June 30, 2020  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Gömöryová E, Barančíková G, Tobiašová E, Halás J, Skalský R, Koco Š, Gömöry D. Responses of soil microorganisms to land use in different soil types along the soil profiles. Soil & Water Res. 2020;15(2):125-134. doi: 10.17221/20/2019-SWR.
Download citation

Supplementary files:

Download fileGomoryova_ESM.pdf

File size: 869.76 kB

References

  1. Ahmed Y.A.-R., Pichler V., Homolák M., Gömöryová E., Nagy D., Pichlerová M., Gregor J. (2012): High organic carbon stock in a karstic soil of the Middle-European forest province persists after centuries-long agroforestry management. European Journal of Forest Research, 13: 1669-1680. Go to original source...
  2. Alef K. (1991): Methodical Manual for Soil Microbiology. Activities, Biomass, Differentiation. Landesberg, Ecomed. (in German)
  3. Barančíková G., Tobiášová E., Gömöryová E., Makovníková J., Halas J., Koco Š., Skalský R. (2019): Influence of soil type and land use on soil organic mater in climate conditions od West Carpathians Mts. and Pannonian Basin. Silva Balcanica 20 (Special Issue 1): 63-70.
  4. Breuer L., Huisman J.A., Keller T., Frede H.G. (2006): Impact of a conversion from cropland to grassland on C and N storage and related soil properties: Analysis of a 60-year chronosequence. Geoderma, 133: 6-18. Go to original source...
  5. Cade-Menun B.J., Bainard L.D., LaForge K., Schellenberg M., Houston B., Hamel C. (2017): Long-term agricultural land use affects chemical and physical properties of soils from southwest Saskatchewan. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 97: 650-666. Go to original source...
  6. Caili S., Guobin L., Sha X. (2016): Land-use conversion changes the multifractal features of particle-size distribution on the loess plateau China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 13: 785. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Cao Ch., Zhang Y., Qian W., Liang C., Wang C., Tao Sh. (2017): Land-use changes influence soil bacterial communities in a meadow grassland in Northeast China. Solid Earth, 8: 1119-1129. Go to original source...
  8. Celik I. (2005): Land-use effetcs on organic matter and physical properties of soil in a southern Mediterranean highland of Turkey. Soil and Tillage Research, 83: 270-277. Go to original source...
  9. FAO (2016): World Deforestation Slows Down as More Forests are Better Managed. Available at: http://www.fao.org/news/story/en/item/326911/icode (accessed June 27, 2017)
  10. Girvan M.S., Bullimore J., Pretty J.N., Osborn A.M., Ball A.S. (2003): Soil type is the primary determinant of the composition of the total and active bacterial communities in arable soils. Applied Environmental Microbiology, 69: 1800-1809. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Gömöryová E., Gregor J., Pichler V., Gömöry D. (2006): Spatial patterns of soil microbial characteristics and soil moisture in a natural beech forest. Biologia, 61: S329-S333. Go to original source...
  12. Hebb C., Schoderbek D., Hernandez-Ramirez G., Hewins D., Carlyle C.N., Bork E. (2017): Soil physical quality varies among contrasting land uses in Northern Prairie regions. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment, 240: 14-23. Go to original source...
  13. Herold N., Schöning I., Berner D., Haslwimmer H., Kandeler E., Michalzik B., Schrumpf M. (2014): Vertical gradients of potential enzyme activities in soil profiles of European beech, Norway spruce and Scots pine dominated forest sites. Pedobiologia - Journal of Soil Ecology, 57: 181-189. Go to original source...
  14. Hill M.O. (1973): Diversity and eveness: A unifying notation and its consequences. Ecology, 54: 427-432. Go to original source...
  15. Hofmann K., Lamprecht A., Pauli H., Illmer P. (2016): Distribution of prokaryotic abundance and microbial nutrient cycling across a high-alpine altitudinal gradient in the Austrian Central Alps is affected by vegetation, temperature, and soil nutrients. Microbial Ecology, 72: 704-716. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Insam H., Goberna M. (2004): Use of Biolog® for the Community Level Physiological Profiling (CLPP) of Environmental Samples. Molecular Microbial Ecology Manual 4.01, 2nd Ed., Kluwer Academic Publishers: 853-860.
  17. Islam K.R., Weil R.R. (1998): Microwave irradiation of soil for routine measurements of microbial biomass carbon. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 27: 408-416. Go to original source...
  18. Kandeler E. (1993): Determination of N-mineralisation in an anaerobic cultivation experiment. In: Schinner F. et al. (eds.): Bodenbiologische Arbeitsmethoden. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Springer Verlag: 160-161. (in German)
  19. Keen Y.C., Jalloh M.B., Ahmed O.H., Sudin M., Besar N.A. (2011): Soil organic matter and related soil properties in forest, grassland and cultivated land use types. International Journal of Physical Sciences, 6: 7410-7415. Go to original source...
  20. Khaziev F.CH. (1976): Enzymatic Activity of Soils. Moskva, Metodicheskoe posobije. (in Russian)
  21. Kobza J., Hrivňáková K., Makovníková J., Barančíková G., Bezák P., Bezáková Z., Dodok R., Grečo V., Chlpík J., Lištjak M., Mališ J., Píš V., Schlosserová J., Slávik O., Styk J., Širáň M. (2011): Uniform Working Procedures of Soil Analysis. VÚPOP, Bratislava. (in Slovak)
  22. Lal R. (2002): Soil carbon dynamics in cropland and rangeland. Environmental Pollution, 116: 353-362. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Lauber C.L., Strickland M.S., Bradford M.A., Fierer N. (2008): The influence of soil properties on the structure of bacterial and fungal communities across land-use types. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 40: 2407-2415. Go to original source...
  24. Liu D., Huang Y.M, An S.S., Sun H.Y., Bhople P., Chen Z. (2018): Soil physicochemical and microbial characteristics of contrasting land-use types along soil depth gradients. Catena, 162: 345-353. Go to original source...
  25. Loginov W., Wisniewski W., Gonet S.S., Ciescinska B. (1987): Fractionation of organic carbon based on susceptibility to oxidation. Polish Journal of Soil Science, 20: 47-52.
  26. Malik A.A., Puissant J., Buckeridge K.M. (2018): Land use driven change in soil pH affects microbial carbon cycling processes. Nature Communications, 9: 3591. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  27. Marinari S., Antisari L.V. (2010): Effect of lithological substrate on microbial biomass and enzyme activity in brown soil profiles inthe northern Apennines (Italy). Pedobiologia, 53: 313-320. Go to original source...
  28. Paul E.A. (2007): Soil Microbiology, Ecology and Biochemistry. 3rd Ed., Oxford, Elsevier, Inc. Go to original source...
  29. Romanowicz K.J., Freedman Z.B., Upchurch R.A., Argiroff W.A., Zak D.R. (2016): Active microorganisms in forest soils differ from the total community yet are shaped by the same environmental factors: the influence of pH and soil moisture. FEMS Micobial Ecology, 92: fiw149. Go to original source...
  30. Seuradge B.J., Oelbermann M., Neufeld J.D. (2017): Depthdependent influence of different land-use systems on bacterial biogeography. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 93: fiw237. Go to original source...
  31. Standford G., Smith S.J. (1978): Oxidative release of potentially mineralizable soil nitrogen by acid permanganate extraction. Soil Science, 126: 210-218. Go to original source...
  32. ter Braak C.J.F., Šmilauer P. (2002): Reference Manual and User's Guide to Canoco for Windows. Software for Canonical Community Ordination (Version 4). Wageningen, Centre of Biometry.
  33. Van Leeuwen J.P., Djukic I., Bloem J., Lehtinen T., Hemerik L., de Ruiter P.C., Lair G. J. (2017): Effects of land use on soil microbial biomass, activity and community structure at different soil depths in the Danube floodplain. European Journal of Soil Biology, 79: 14-20. Go to original source...
  34. Wachendorf C., Stuelpnagel R., Wachendorf M. (2017): Influence of land use and tillage depth on dynamics of soil microbial properties, soil carbon fractions and crop yield after conversion of short-rotation coppice. Soil Use and Management, 33: 379-388. Go to original source...
  35. Ye R., Wright A.L., Inglett K., Wang Y., Ogram A.V., Reddy K.R. (2009): Land-use effects on soil nutrient cycling and microbial community dynamics in the Everglades agricultural area, Florida. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 40: 2725-2742. Go to original source...
  36. Zhang Q., Wu J., Yang F., Lei Y., Zhang Q., Cheng X. (2016): Alterations in soil microbial community composition and biomass following agricultural land use. Scientific Reports, 6: 36587. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  37. Zhao M., Sun B., Wu L., Gao Q., Wang F., Wen C., Wang M., Liang Y., Hale L., Zhou J., Yang Y. (2016): Zonal soil type determines soil microbial responses to maize cropping and fertilization. mSystems, 1: e00075-16. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.