Soil & Water Res., 2024, 19(2):77-89 | DOI: 10.17221/76/2023-SWR

Comparison of two soil quality assessment models under different land uses and topographical units on the southwest slope of Mount MerapiOriginal Paper

Retno Meitasari ORCID..., Eko Hanudin* ORCID..., Benito Heru Purwanto ORCID...
Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Gadjah Mada, D.I. Yogyakarta, Indonesia

This study aims to compare the soil quality indexing model by adding and weighting the soil under different land uses and slope positions on the southwest slope of Mount Merapi, Indonesia. Soil sampling was carried out based on a landscape analysis divided into four geomorphological units (slopes): upper, middle, lower and foot slopes. The research design was nested where the soil sample was located (surface soil 0–30 cm). Based on the research results, soil quality indices (SQI) of forest on the upper slopes is very high. SQI of dry fields on the middle, lower and foot slopes is low to medium. SQI of mixed gardens on the middle and lower slopes is low to medium. SQI of snake fruit land on the middle, lower and foot slopes is medium to high. SQI of grassland on the lower slopes is medium to high, and SQI of paddy fields on the foot slopes is medium to high. Weighted soil quality index (SQIw) has a higher correlation (R2 = 0.90) and can predict soil quality better than the adding soil quality index (SQIa) model (R2 = 0.76). Indicators that most influence soil quality are the percentage of sand, total N, C-POM, C-Min, pH, and aggregate stability, that indicators are entirely influenced by organic matter, site-specific management to maintain SQI by maintaining organic matter. The selected indicators in this study can be used to determine the SQI in similar areas.

Keywords: indexing; indicators; land use; slope position; soil quality

Received: July 24, 2023; Revised: January 31, 2024; Accepted: February 9, 2024; Prepublished online: March 25, 2024; Published: May 23, 2024  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Meitasari R, Hanudin E, Purwanto BH. Comparison of two soil quality assessment models under different land uses and topographical units on the southwest slope of Mount Merapi. Soil & Water Res. 2024;19(2):77-89. doi: 10.17221/76/2023-SWR.
Download citation

References

  1. Aini L., Soenarminto B., Hanudin E., Sartohadi J. (2019): Plant nutritional potency of recent volcanic materials from the southern flank of Mt. Merapi, Indonesia. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 25: 527-533.
  2. Anda M., Sarwani M. (2012): Mineralogy, chemical composition, and dissolution of fresh ash eruption: New potential source of nutrients. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 76: 733-747. Go to original source...
  3. Anda M., Dahlgren R.A. (2020): Long-term response of tropical Andisol properties to conversion from rainforest to agriculture. Catena, 194: 104679. Go to original source...
  4. Andrews S.S., Karlen D.L., Mitchell J.P. (2002): A comparison of soil quality indexing methods for vegetable production systems in Northern California. Agriculture Ecosystem Environment, 90: 25-45. Go to original source...
  5. Andrews S.S., Karlen D.L., Cambardella C.A. (2004): The soil management assessment framework: A quantitative soil quality evaluation method. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 68: 1945-1962. Go to original source...
  6. Askari M.S., Holden N.M. (2015): Quantitative soil quality indexing of temperate arable management systems. Soil and Tillage Research, 150: 57-67. Go to original source...
  7. Belayneh B., Eyasu E., Getachew A. (2021): Effects of landscape positions on soil physicochemical properties at Shenkolla Watershed, South Central Ethiopia. Environmental Systems Research, 10: 1-15. Go to original source...
  8. Benbi D.K., Ritcher J. (2002): A critical review of some approaches to modelling nitrogen mineralization. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 35: 168-183. Go to original source...
  9. Black C.A. (1965): Methods of soil analysis, Part 2. In: Chemical and Microbiological Properties. Madison, American Society of Agronomy, Inc.: 771-1572.
  10. Bufebo B., Elias E., Agegnehu G. (2021): Effects of landscape positions on soil physicochemical properties at Shenkolla watershed, South Central Ethiopia. Environmental Systems Research, 10:1-15. Go to original source...
  11. Bünemann E.K., Bongiorno G., Bai Z., Creamer R.E., De Deyn G., De Goede R., Brussaard L. (2018): Soil quality - A critical review. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 120: 105-125. Go to original source...
  12. Chevallier T., Woignier T., Toucet J., Blanchart E., Dieudonne P. (2008): Fractal structure in natural gels: Effect on carbon sequestration in volcanic soils. Journal of Sol-Gel Science and Technology, 48: 231-238. Go to original source...
  13. De Leenheer L., De Boodt M. (1959): Determination of aggregate satability by the change in mean weight diameter. Proc. Int. Sym. Soil Structure, Ghent, 1958, Vol. 24: 290-300.
  14. De Paul Obade V., Lal R. (2014): Soil quality evaluation under different land management practices. Environmental Earth Sciences, 72: 4531-4549. Go to original source...
  15. Delmelle P., Opfergelt S., Cornelis J.T. (2015): Volcanic Soils. Earth & Life Institute. Environmental Scienses. Louvain, Universite' Catholique de Louvain. Go to original source...
  16. Derakhshan-Babaei F., Nosrati K., Mirghaed F.A., Egli M. (2021): The interrelation between landform, land-use, erosion and soil quality in the Kan catchment of the Tehran province, central Iran. Cantena, 204: 105412. Go to original source...
  17. Ermadani E., Hermansah H., Yulnafatmawita Y., Syarif A. (2018): Dynamics of soil organic carbon fractions under different land management in wet tropical areas. Jurnal Solum, 15: 26-39. Go to original source...
  18. Fiantis D., Nelson M., Van Ranst E., Shamshuddin J., Qafoku N.P. (2009): Chemical weathering of new pyroclastic deposits from Mt. Merapi (Java), Indonesia. Journal of Mountain Science, 6: 240-254. Go to original source...
  19. Fu B. J., Liu S.L., Chen L.D., Lü Y.H., Qiu J. (2004): Soil quality regime in relation to land cover and slope position across a highly modified slope landscape. Ecological Research, 19: 111-118. Go to original source...
  20. Geng J., Fang H., Cheng S., Pei J. (2021): Effects of N deposition on the quality and quantity of soil organic matter in a boreal forest: Contrasting roles of ammonium and nitrate. Catena, 198: 104996. Go to original source...
  21. Ghimire P., Bhatta B., Pokhrel B., Shrestha I. (2018): Assessment of soil quality for different land uses in the Chure region of Central Nepal. Journal of Agriculture and Natural Resources, 1: 32-42. Go to original source...
  22. Gosling P., Parsons N., Bending G.D. (2013): What are the primary factors controlling the light fraction and particulate soil organic matter content of agricultural soils? Biology and Fertility of Soils, 49: 1001-1014. Go to original source...
  23. Govaerts B., Sayre K.D., Deckers J. (2006): A minimum data set for soil quality assessment of wheat and maize cropping in the highlands of Mexico. Soil and Tillage Research, 87: 163-174. Go to original source...
  24. Guo L.L., Sun Z.G., Ouyang Z.D.R., Han, F.D. (2017): A comparison of soil quality evaluation methods for Fluvisol along the lower Yellow River. Catena, 152: 135-143. Go to original source...
  25. Harahap F.S., Oesman R., Fadhillah W., Rafika M. (2021): Chemical characteristics of inceptisol soil with urea and goat manure fertilizer. Jurnal Gronomi Tanaman Tropika, 3: 117-127. Go to original source...
  26. Jak¹iæ S., Ninkov J., Miliæ S., Vasin J., ®ivanov M., Jak¹iæ D., Komlen V. (2021): Influence of slope gradient and aspect on soil organic carbon content in the region of Ni¹, Serbia. Sustainability, 13: 8332. Go to original source...
  27. Karlen D.L., Scott D.E. (1994): A framework for evaluating physical and chemical indicators of soil quality. In: Doran J.W., Coleman D.C., Bezdicek D.F., Stewart B.A. (eds.): Defining Soil Quality for a Sustainable Environment. American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science Society of America: 53-72. Go to original source...
  28. Karlen D.L., Mausbach M.J., Doran J.W., Cline R.G., Harris R.F., Schuman G.E. (1997): Soil quality: A concept, definition, and framework for evaluation. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 61: 4-10. Go to original source...
  29. Kartikawati R., Hanudin E., Purwanto B.H. (2019): Physico-chemical properties of volcanic soils under different perennial plants from upland area of Mt. Merapi, Indonesia. Planta Tropika, 7: 93-102. Go to original source...
  30. Khan F., Hayat Z. , Ahmad W., Ramzan M., Shah Z., Sharif M., Hanif M. (2013): Effect of slope position on physico-chemical properties of eroded soil. Soil and Environment, 32: 22-28.
  31. Kurniawan S., Agustina M.P., Wiwaha R.A., Wijaya A.Y., Fitria A.D. (2021): Soil quality degradation under horticulture practices in volcanic slope soil, East Java-Indonesia. In: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 648: 012062. Go to original source...
  32. Kusumawati A., Hanudin E., Purwanto B.H., Nurudin M. (2023): Assessing soil quality index under different sugarcane monoculture periods and soil orders. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 54: 225-242. Go to original source...
  33. Lima A.C.R., Brussaard L., Totola M.R., Hoogmoed W.B., De Goede R.G.M. (2013): A functional evaluation of three indicator sets for assessing soil quality. Applied Soil Ecology, 64: 194-200. Go to original source...
  34. Liu M., Han G., Zhang Q. (2019): Effects of soil aggregate stability on soil organic carbon and nitrogen under land use change in an Erodible Region in Southwest China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16: 3809. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  35. Malone Z., Berhe A.A., Ryals R. (2023): Impacts of organic matter amendments on urban soil carbon and soil quality: A meta-analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 419: 138148. Go to original source...
  36. Marriott E.E., Wander M.M. (2006): Total and labile soil organic matter in organic and conventional farming systems. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 70: 950-959. Go to original source...
  37. Martín-Sanz J.P., De Santiago-Martín A., Valverde-Asenjo I., Quintana-Nieto J.R., González-Huecas C., López-Lafuente A.L. (2022): Comparison of soil quality indexes calculated by network and principal component analysis for carbonated soils under different uses. Ecological Indicators, 143: 109374. Go to original source...
  38. Masto R.E., Sheik S., Nehru G., Selvi V.A., George J., Ram L.C. (2015): Assessment of environmental soil quality around Sonepur Bazari mine of Raniganj coalfield, India. Solid Earth, 6: 811-821. Go to original source...
  39. Nabiollahi K., Taghizadeh-Mehrjardi R., Kerry R., Moradian S. (2017): Assessment of soil quality indices for salt-affected agricultural land in Kurdistan Province, Iran. Ecological Indicators, 83: 482-494. Go to original source...
  40. Nanko K., Ugawa S., Hashimoto S., Imaya A., Kobayashi M., Sakai H., Kaneko S. (2014): A pedotransfer function for estimating bulk density of forest soil in Japan affected by volcanic ash. Geoderma, 213: 36-45. Go to original source...
  41. Noviyanto A., Purwanto P., Minardi S., Supriyadi S. (2017): The assessment of soil quality of various age of land reclamation after coal mining: A chronosequence study. Journal of Degraded and Mining Lands Management, 5: 1009-1018. Go to original source...
  42. Prayitno A., Sartohadi J., Nurudin M. (2019): Utilization of soil function information for assessing soil quality of paddy field in the quaternary-tertiary volcanic transitional zones in Central Java. Journal of Soil Science and Agroclimatology, 16: 169-180. Go to original source...
  43. Raiesi F. (2017): A minimum data set and soil quality index to quantify the effect of land use conversion on soil quality and degradation in native rangelands of upland arid and semiarid regions. Ecological Indicators, 75: 307-320. Go to original source...
  44. Sanchez-Navarro A., Gil-Vazquez J.M., Delgado-Iniesta M.J., Marin-Sanleandro P., Blanco-Bernardeau A., Ortiz-Silla R. (2015): Establishing an index and identification of limiting parameters for characterizing soil quality in Mediterranean ecosystems. Catena, 131: 35-45. Go to original source...
  45. Sharma K.L., Mandal U.K., Srinivas K., Vittal K.P.R., Mandal B., Grace J.K., Ramesh V. (2005): Long-term soil management effects on crop yields and soil quality in a dryland Alfisol. Soil and Tillage Research, 83: 246-259. Go to original source...
  46. SRI (2009): Technical Guideline for Chemical Analysis of Soil, Plants, Water And Fertilizer. 2nd Ed. Bogor, Indonesian Soil Research Institute: 7-33.
  47. USDA (2014): Soil Survey Field and Laboratory Methods Manual. Soil Survey Investigations Report No. 51. Version 2. Washington, D.C., USDA.
  48. USDA (2016): National Soil Survey Handbook. Natural Resources Conservation Service. Washington, D.C., USDA.
  49. Vasu D., Singh S.K., Ray S.K., Duraisami V.P., Tiwary P., Chandran P., Nimkar A.M., Anantwar S.G. (2016): Soil quality index (SQI) as a tool to evaluate crop productivity in semi-arid Deccan plateau, India. Geoderma, 282: 70-79. Go to original source...
  50. Wander M.M., Walter G.L., Nissen T.M., Bollero G.A., Andrews S.S., Cavanaugh-Grant D.A. (2002): Soil quality: Science and process. Agronomy Journal, 94: 23-32. Go to original source...
  51. Yuliani N., Hanudin E., Purwanto B.H. (2017): Chemical characteristics and morphology of amorphous materials derived from different parent materials from Central Java, Indonesia. International Journal of Soil Science. 12: 54-64. Go to original source...
  52. Zhang G., Bai J., Xi M., Zhao Q., Lu Q., Jia J. (2016): Soil quality assessment of coastal wetlands in the Yellow River Delta of China based on the minimum data set. Ecological Indicators, 66: 458-466. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.