Soil & Water Res., 2025, 20(2):84-92 | DOI: 10.17221/92/2024-SWR

Understanding gully erosion development through a geomorphological approachOriginal Paper

Edwin Maulana ORCID...1, Junun Sartohadi ORCID...2,3*, Muhammad Anggri Setiawan ORCID...4,5
1 Department of Environmental Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
2 Department of Soil Science, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
3 Research Center for Land Resources Management, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
4 Department of Environmental Geography, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
5 Center for Disaster Studies, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia Indonesia

This study aims to identify the gully erosion typology and development using a geomorphological approach. Gully geomorphology features were executed using combined photogrammetric approaches: aerial photography (unmanned aerial vehicle, UAV) and terrestrial photo data (structure from motion, SfM). The UAV data are used to identify the gully orientation, while SfM derives the geomorphological features in the gully dimensions. Five canopy-free gully erosion points were selected for the UAV-SfM data acquisition. Typically, SfM data offer higher resolution (0.11–0.57 cm) than UAV data (0.61–2.08 cm). Modelling using SfM can provide an in-depth illustration of gully dimensions such as rill erosion, scars, and cracks. The findings demonstrate that the gully depth and width are larger on the middle slope. This phenomenon is influenced by the strength of the flow and the silt transported by the water, which reaches a peak on the middle slope. The lower slopes have a solid form since the power of the flow weakens as it transports the accumulated silt from the upper and middle slopes. The study’s findings can be relied on to guide communities in strengthening the gully body in the middle slope. Furthermore, the findings can be tested and adopted globally with comparable typologies.

Keywords: erosion; geomorphology; gully; structure from motion

Received: July 25, 2024; Revised: January 6, 2025; Accepted: January 7, 2025; Prepublished online: January 28, 2025; Published: April 10, 2025  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Maulana E, Sartohadi J, Setiawan MA. Understanding gully erosion development through a geomorphological approach. Soil & Water Res. 2025;20(2):84-92. doi: 10.17221/92/2024-SWR.
Download citation

References

  1. Ben Slimane A., Raclot D., Rebai H., Le Bissonnais Y., Planchon O., Bouksila F. (2018): Combining field monitoring and aerial imagery to evaluate the role of gully erosion in a Mediterranean catchment (Tunisia). Catena, 170: 73-83. Go to original source...
  2. Dai W., Qian W., Liu A., Wang C., Yang X., Hu G., Tang G. (2022): Monitoring and modeling sediment transport in space in small loess catchments using UAV-SfM photogrammetry. Catena, 214: 106244. Go to original source...
  3. Fashae O., Obateru R., Olusola A., Dragovich D. (2022): Factors controlling gully morphology on the quartzite ridges of Ibadan, Nigeria. Catena, 212: 106127. Go to original source...
  4. Fattet M., Fu Y., Ghestem M., Ma W., Foulonneau M., Nespoulous J., Le Bissonnais Y., Stokes A. (2011): Effects of vegetation type on soil resistance to erosion: Relationship between aggregate stability and shear strength. Catena, 87: 60-69. Go to original source...
  5. Fernández T., Gómez-Lopez J.M., Pérez-García J.L., Cardenal J., Delgado J., Mata E., Sánchez-Gómez M., Calero J., Tovar-Pescador J., Moya F. (2020): Analysis of gully erosion in a catchment area in olive groves using UAS photogrammetry techniques. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences - ISPRS Archives, 43(B2): 1057-1064. Go to original source...
  6. Gómez-Gutiérrez Á., Schnabel S., Berenguer-Sempere F., Lavado-Contador F., Rubio-Delgado J. (2014): Using 3D photo-reconstruction methods to estimate gully headcut erosion. Catena, 120: 91-101. Go to original source...
  7. He T., Yang Y., Shi Y., Liang X., Fu S., Xie G., Liu B., Liu Y. (2022): Quantifying spatial distribution of interrill and rill erosion in a loess at different slopes using structure from motion (SfM) photogrammetry. International Soil and Water Conservation Research, 10: 393-406. Go to original source...
  8. Kariminejad N., Pourghasemi H.R., Hosseinalizadeh M., Rossi M., Mondini A. (2023): Evaluating land degradation by gully erosion through soil erosion indices and rainfall thresholds. Natural Hazards, 117: 3353-3369. Go to original source...
  9. Luo J., Yang P., Pei X., Li J., Shan S., Duan Y., Huang Y. (2023): Impact of rock fragment shapes and soil cohesion on runoff generation and sediment yield of steep cut slopes under heavy rainfall conditions. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15: 10841. Go to original source...
  10. Maulana E., Sartohadi J., Setiawan M.A. (2023a): AHP GIS-based gully erosion susceptibility modelling in tropical volcano environment. Journal of Hunan University Natural Sciences 50: 190-200. Go to original source...
  11. Maulana E., Sartohadi J., Setiawan M.A. (2023b): Soil conservation at the gully plot scale in the tropical volcanic landscape of Sumbing. AIMS Environment 10: 832-846. Go to original source...
  12. Maulana E., Sartohadi J., Setiawan M.A. (2025): Landscape design for gully erosion control on the upper slopes of Mount Sumbing, Central Java, Indonesia. Journal of Degraded and Mining Lands Management, 12: 7037-7047. Go to original source...
  13. Meinen B.U., Robinson D.T. (2020): Mapping erosion and deposition in an agricultural landscape: Optimization of UAV image acquisition schemes for SfM-MVS. Remote Sensing of Environment, 239: 111666. Go to original source...
  14. Pulungan N.A., Sartohadi J. (2017): Variability of soil development in hilly region, Bogowonto Catchment, Java, Indonesia. International Journal of Soil Science, 13: 1-8. Go to original source...
  15. Ren X., Sun M., Zhang X., Liu L. (2017): A simplified method for UAV multispectral images mosaicking. Remote Sensing, 9: 962. Go to original source...
  16. Sartohadi J., Pulungan N.A.H.J., Nurudin M., Wahyudi W. (2018): The ecological perspective of landslides at soils with high clay content in the middle Bogowonto watershed, Central Java, Indonesia. Applied and Environmental Soil Science, 2018: 648185. Go to original source...
  17. Sidorchuk A. (2005): Stochastic components in the gully erosion modelling. Catena, 63: 299-317. Go to original source...
  18. Sun H., Luo L., Guo W., Hu X., Xu Y., Wang W. (2024): Exploring rational vegetation configuration to relative increase runoff, reduce erosion and soil organic carbon loss in gully-slopes on the Chinese Loess Plateau. Journal of Hydrology, 640: 131678. Go to original source...
  19. Wang R., Sun H., Yang J., Zhang S., Fu H., Wang N., Liu Q. (2022): Quantitative evaluation of gully erosion using multitemporal UAV data in the Southern Black Soil Region of Northeast China: A Case Study. Remote Sensing, 14: 1479. Go to original source...
  20. Wasson R.J., Caitcheon G., Murray A.S., McCulloch M., Quade J. (2002): Sourcing sediment using multiple tracers in the catchment of Lake Argyle, Northwestern Australia. Environmental Management, 29: 634-646. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Yang Y., Shi Y., Liang X., Huang T., Fu S., Liu B. (2021): Evaluation of structure from motion (SfM) photogrammetry on the measurement of rill and interrill erosion in a typical loess. Geomorphology, 385: 107734. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.