Soil & Water Res., 2025, 20(4):265-273 | DOI: 10.17221/24/2025-SWR
The role of ground heat flux in estimating evapotranspiration by the Penman-Monteith method on mountain meadowOriginal Paper
- 1 Faculty of Civil Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
- 2 Institute of Hydrodynamics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic
Ground heat flux (G) is often an overlooked component of the surface energy balance, and its accurate determination remains challenging. In the present study, the accuracy of various G estimation methods is examined using long-term measurements from the Central European mountain meadow. The impact of different G approximation on calculated evapotranspiration by the Penman-Monteith method (ET) is analysed. Soil heat flux measurements and surface temperature data were used to determine G, while net radiation was used to approximate G. Neglecting G led to an overestimation of ET in the daily timestep. On the contrary, the FAO-recommended hourly approximation overestimated G, underestimating ET. Site-specific calibrations of G prediction models improved their accuracy. For daily average G, as well as for hourly average G, simple constant parameter models (i.e., models including a single parameter specifying the fraction of net radiation directly) provide satisfactory accuracy of ET evaluation. However, in an hourly timestep, net radiation fails as a predictor of G shortly after sunrise and before sunset. The findings emphasise the importance of considering G in ET calculations and the need for site-specific calibrations of G estimation models.
Keywords: evapotranspiration of grass; Penman-Monteith equation; sandy loam texture; soil heat flux; soil temperature
Received: March 10, 2025; Revised: July 14, 2025; Accepted: September 4, 2025; Prepublished online: October 1, 2025; Published: October 14, 2025 Show citation
ACS | AIP | APA | ASA | Harvard | Chicago | Chicago Notes | IEEE | ISO690 | MLA | NLM | Turabian | Vancouver |
References
- Allen R.G., Pereira L.S., Raes D., Smith M. (1998): Crop Evapotranspiration: Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements. Rome, FAO.
- Burridge D.M., Gadd A.J. (1977): The Meteorological Office Operational 10-level Numerical Weather Prediction Model. Scientific Paper - Meteorological Office. Bracknell, British Meteorological Office.
- Campbell G.S., Norman J.M. (1998): An Introduction to Environmental Biophysics. Springer.
Go to original source...
- Irmak A., Singh R.K., Walter-Shea E.A., Verma S.B., Suyker A.E. (2011): Comparison and analysis of empirical equations for soil heat flux for different cropping systems and irrigation methods. Transactions of the ASABE, 54: 67-80.
Go to original source...
- Li T.L., Schiavo M., Zumr D. (2023): Seasonal variations of vegetative indices and their correlation with evapotranspiration and soil water storage in a small agricultural catchment. Soil and Water Research, 18: 246-268.
Go to original source...
- Liu Z. (2022): Accuracy of five ground heat flux empirical simulation methods in the surface-energy-balance-based remote-sensing evapotranspiration models. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 26: 6207-6226.
Go to original source...
- Monteith J.L. (1965): Evaporation and environment. In: Thornthwaite G.W. (ed.): Climatology. Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology. Drexel Institute of Technology: 205-234.
- Ochsner T.E., Sauer T.J., Horton R. (2006): Field tests of the soil heat flux plate method and some alternatives. Agronomy Journal, 98: 1005-1014.
Go to original source...
- Purdy A.J., Fisher J.B., Goulden M.L., Famiglietti J.S. (2016): Ground heat flux: An analytical review of 6 models evaluated at 88 sites and globally. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 121: 3045-3059.
Go to original source...
- Sauer T.J., Norman J.M. (1995): Simulated canopy microclimate using estimated below-canopy soil surface transfer coefficients. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 75: 135-160.
Go to original source...
- Seguin B., Itier B. (1983): Using midday surface temperature to estimate daily evaporation from satellite thermal IR data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 4: 371-383.
Go to original source...
- Smith K.A., Ball T., Conen F., Dobbie K.E., Massheder J., Rey A. (2018): Exchange of greenhouse gases between soil and atmosphere: Interactions of soil physical factors and biological processes. European Journal of Soil Science, 69: 10-20.
Go to original source...
- Sun M.-Y., Shi B., Cui Y.-J., Tang C.-S., Zheng X., Zhong P., Wang Y.-Q., Tong Y.-P. (2022): Evaluating three measurement methods of soil ground heat flux based on actively heated distributed temperature sensing technology. Engineering Geology, 303: 106649.
Go to original source...
- Tasumi M., Trezza R., Allen R.G., Wright J.L. (2005): Operational aspects of satellite-based energy balance models for irrigated crops in the semi-arid U.S. Irrigation and Drainage Systems, 19: 355-376.
Go to original source...
- Zawilski B.M. (2022): The soil heat flux sensor functioning checks, imbalances' origins, and forgotten energies. Geoscientific Instrumentation, Methods and Data Systems Discussions, 11: 223-234.
Go to original source...
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.