Soil & Water Res., X:X | DOI: 10.17221/66/2025-SWR

Possibilities of agricultural soils evaluation in the Czech RepublicOriginal Paper

Věra Ürge2, Pavel Formánek1, Jan Vopravil1,2
1 Research Institute for Soil and Water Conservation, Prague, Czech Republic
2 Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic

In this study, the evaluation of soil quality was realised using the Analytic Hierarchy Process, and the obtained values were integrated with Evaluated Soil Ecological Units (BPEJs). Different maps of the Czech Republic were elaborated with BPEJs classified into five soil protection classes based on the obtained model values (with or without the values for production potential), the ratio of 80% (production potential values) to 20% (model values) or 60% (production potential values) to 40% (model values) and 40% (production potential values) to 60% (model values). The evaluation of BPEJs based on the mentioned criteria showed differences in their classification into individual soil protection classes and possibilities of their use or withdrawal from the agricultural land fund. Compared with the existing categorization of BPEJs into soil protection classes (according to Decree No. 48/2011 Coll.), the use of presented model (plus production potential) values, the ratio of 80 : 20%, 60 : 40% or 40 : 60% (production potential: model) caused the numbers of BPEJs increased in those soil protection classes where the withdrawal of soils from the agricultural land fund is possible only exceptionally or it is possible to use the soils for building purposes only under certain conditions.

Keywords: agricultural land resources; hydrological groups; physical soil properties; soil quality indicator; texture

Received: June 5, 2025; Revised: July 8, 2025; Accepted: July 23, 2025; Prepublished online: August 19, 2025 

Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Ahad T., Kanth T.A., Nahi S. (2015): Soil bulk density as related to texture, organic matter content and porosity in Kandi soils of district Kupwara (Kashmir valley), India. International Journal of Scientific Research, 4: 198-200.
    2. Akhila A., Entoori K. (2022): Role of earthworms in soil fertility and its impact on agriculture: A review. International Journal of Fauna and Biological Studies, 9: 55-63. Go to original source...
    3. Blum W.E.H. (2005): Functions of soil for society and the environment. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 5: 145-148. Go to original source...
    4. Bünemann E.K., Bongiorno G., Bai Z., Creamer R.E., De Deyn G., de Goede R., Fleskens L., Geissen V., Kuyper T.W., Mäder P., Pulleman M., Sukkel W., van Groenigen J.W., Brussaard L. (2018): Soil quality - A critical review. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 120: 105-125. Go to original source...
    5. Domagoj R., Vladimir Z., Mirta R. (2014): Impacts of liming with dolomite on soil pH and phosphorus and potassium availabilities. In: Fekete A. (ed.): Proc. 13th Alps-Adria Scientific Workshop, Villach, Ossiacher See, Apr 28-May 3, 2014: 193-196.
    6. Drobnik T., Greiner L., Keller A., Grêt-Regamey A. (2018): Soil quality indicators - From soil functions to ecosystem services. Ecological Indicators, 94: 151-169. Go to original source...
    7. El Behairy R.A., El Arwash H.M., El Baroudy A.A., Ibrahim M.M., Mohamed E.S., Kucher D.E., Shokr M.S. (2024): How can soil quality be accurately and quickly studied? A Review. Agronomy, 14: 1682. Go to original source...
    8. Fernández M.P., Keshavarzi A., Rodrigo-Comino J., Schnabel S., Contador J.F.L., Gutiérrez Á.G., Parra F.J.L., González J.B., Torreño A.A., Cerdà A. (2020): Developing scoring functions to assess soil quality at a regional scale in rangelands of SW Spain. Revista Brasileira de Ciencia Do Solo, 44: e0200090. Go to original source...
    9. Guilin L., Jie C., Zhiying S., Manzhi T. (2007): Establishing a minimum dataset for soil quality assessment based on soil properties and land-use changes. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 27: 2715-2724. Go to original source...
    10. Iranmanesh M., Sadeghi H. (2019): Effects of soil texture and nitrogen on ability of carbon sequestration in different organs of two Tamarix species as a good choice for carbon stock in dry lands. Ecological Engineering, 139: 105577. Go to original source...
    11. IUSS Working Group WRB (2015): World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014. International Soil Classification System for Naming Soils and Creating Legends for Soil Maps (Update 2015). Rome, FAO.
    12. Janků J., Kosánová M., Kozák J., Herza T., Jehlička J., Maitah M., Vopravil J., Němeček K., Toth D., Jacko K., Vácha R., Poláková J. (2022a): Using soil quality indicators to assess their production and ecological functions. Soil and Water Research, 17: 45-58. Go to original source...
    13. Janků J., Jehlička J., Heřmanová K., Toth D., Maitah M., Kozák J., Vopravil J., Vácha R., Jacko K., Herza T. (2022b): An overview of a land evaluation in the context of ecosystem services. Soil and Water Research, 17: 1-14. Go to original source...
    14. Marhoul A.M., Herza T., Kozák J., Janků J., Jehlička J., Borůvka L., Němeček K., Jetmar M., Polák P. (2025a): New version of PUGIS - Soil information system of the Czech Republic. Soil and Water Research, 20: 1-15. Go to original source...
    15. Marhoul A.M., Herza T., Kozák J., Janků J., Jehlička J., Borůvka L., Němeček K., Jetmar M., Polák P. (2025b): Approximation of the soil particle-size distribution curve using a NURBS curve. Soil and Water Research, 20: 16-31. Go to original source...
    16. Maurya S., Abraham J.S., Somasundaram S., Toteja R., Gupta R., Makhija S. (2020): Indicators for assessment of soil quality: A mini-review. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment,192: 604. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    17. Meitasari R., Hanudin E., Purwanto B.H. (2024): Comparison of two soil quality assessment models under different land uses and topographical units on the southwest slope of Mount Merapi. Soil and Water Research, 19: 77-89. Go to original source...
    18. Mete F.Z., Mia S., Dijkstra F.A., Abuyusuf M., Hossain A.S.M.I. (2015): Synergistic effects of biochar and NPK fertiliser on soybean yield in an alkaline soil. Pedosphere, 25: 713-719. Go to original source...
    19. Moreira A.C., Rodrigues A. (2021): Effect of soil water content and soil texture on Phytophthora cinnamomic infection on cork and holm oak. Silva Lusitana, 29: 133-160. Go to original source...
    20. Mylavarapu R.S., Zinati G.M. (2009): Improvement of soil properties using compost for optimum parsley production in sandy soils. Scientia Horticulturae, 120: 426-430. Go to original source...
    21. Novák P., Vopravil J., Lagová J. (2010): Assessment of the soil quality as a complex of productive and environmental soil function potentials. Soil and Water Research, 5: 113-119. Go to original source...
    22. Popović B., Šeput M., Lončarić Z., Andrišić M., Rašić D., Karalić K. (2010): Comparison of Al P and Olsen P test in calcareous soils in Croatia. Poljoprivreda, 16: 38-42.
    23. Poss R., Saragoni H. (1992): Leaching of nitrate, calcium and magnesium under maize cultivation on an oxisol in Togo. Fertilizer Research, 33: 123-133. Go to original source...
    24. Poudel B., Neupane S., Chaudhary G., Bhatt A. (2024): Effect of spacing and different levels of phosphorus on growth and yield of Malepatan-1 variety of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (Linn.) Walp.) in Dang District, Nepal. Advances in Agriculture, 2024: 394237. Go to original source...
    25. Reeves D.W. (1997): The role of soil organic matter in maintaining soil quality in continuous cropping systems. Soil and Tillage Research, 43: 131-167. Go to original source...
    26. Rubinić V., Safner T. (2019): Prediction of bulk density in Croatian forest Pseudogleys based on contents of soil organic matter and clay. Journal of Central European Agriculture, 20: 491-503. Go to original source...
    27. Saaty T.L. (1987): The analytic hierarchy process - what it is and how it is used. Mathematical Modelling, 9: 161-176. Go to original source...
    28. Sharkov I.N., Bukreeva S.L. (2004): Decomposition of 14C-labelled wheat straw in substrates of different texture. Eurasian Soil Science, 37: 420-422.
    29. Toth D., Janků J., Marhoul A.M., Kozák J., Maitah M., Jehlička J., Řeháček L., Přikryl R., Herza T., Vopravil J., Kincl D., Khel T. (2023): Soil quality assessment using SAS (Soil Assessment System). Soil and Water Research, 18: 1-15. Go to original source...
    30. Van Eekeren N., de Boer H., Hanegraaf M., Bokhorst J., Nierop D., Bloem J., Schouten T., de Goede R., Brussaard L. (2010): Ecosystem services in grassland associated with biotic and abiotic soil parameters. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 42: 1491-1504. Go to original source...
    31. Voltr V., Bartlová J., Brtnický M., Denešová O., Froněk P., Honz J., Hlavsa T., Hruška M., Khel T., Kohut M., Křen J., Kubát J., Kučera J., Lang J., Leština J., Lipavský J., Míša P., Novák P., Podešvová J., Pokorný E., Rožnovský J., Štolbová M., Šařec O., Trantinová M., Vigner J., Vilhelm V., Vopravil J. (2011). Soil Evaluation in Conditions of Environmental Protection. Praha, Ústav zemědělské ekonomiky a informací. (in Czech)
    32. Vopravil J., Novotný I., Khel T., Hladík J., Jacko K., Papaj V., Vašků Z., Vrabcová T., Pírková I., Rožnovský J., Havelková L., Huml J., Sekanina A., Novák P., Voltr V., Středa T., Kohoutová L., Poruba M., Czelis R., Janků J., Penížek V. (2011): Soil and its Evaluation in the Czech Republic, Part II. Prague, Research Institute for Soil and Water Conservation. (in Czech)
    33. Vopravil J., Podrázský V., Batysta M., Novák P., Havelková L., Hrabalíková M. (2015): Identification of agricultural soils suitable for afforestation in the Czech Republic using a soil database. Journal of Forest Science, 61: 141-147. Go to original source...
    34. Vopravil J., Formánek P., Janků J., Khel T. (2021a): Soil water dynamics in drained and undrained meadows. Soil and Water Research, 16: 256-267. Go to original source...
    35. Vopravil J., Formánek P., Khel T. (2021b): Comparison of the physical properties of soils belonging to different reference soil groups. Soil and Water Research, 16: 29-38. Go to original source...
    36. Vopravil J., Formánek P., Khel T., Jacko K. (2024): Water content in soil afforested with a mixture of broadleaves or Scots pine. Journal of Forest Science, 70: 91-101. Go to original source...
    37. Vopravil J., Formánek P., Holubík O., Svoboda P., Khel T. (2025): Effects of variable rate fertiliser application on selected macronutrients leaching from the ploughed layer. Soil and Water Research, 20: 206-217. Go to original source...
    38. Wang L., He Z., Zhao W., Wang C., Ma D. (2022): Fine soil texture is conducive to crop productivity and nitrogen retention in irrigated cropland in a desert-oasis ecotone, Northwest China. Agronomy, 12: 1509. Go to original source...
    39. Ye J., Zhang Q., Liu G., Lin L., Wang H., Lin S., Wang Y., Wang Y., Zhang Q., Jia X., He H. (2022): Relationship of soil pH value and soil Pb bio-availability and Pb enrichment in tea leaves. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 102: 1137-1145. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return