Soil & Water Res., 2006, 1(1):3-9 | DOI: 10.17221/6499-SWR

Methods for the Assessment of Humic Substances Quality in Forest SoilsOriginal Paper

Lenka Mládková, Marcela Rohošková, Luboš Borůvka
Department of Soil Science and Geology, Czech University of Agriculture in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic

This paper is focused on soil organic matter quality assessment in acid forest soils. Soil samples were collected in the Jizera Mountains region. Vegetation cover of sampling sites was formed by spruce or beech monocultures. Humus quality was assessed by the ratio of absorbances of pyrophosphate soil extract at the wavelengths of 400 and 600 nm (A400/A600). Humus fractionation was performed on selected soil samples. DRIFT spectra of individual fractions were measured. Higher pH and lower C and N contents were found in beech forest than in spruce forest. A400/A600 well correlates with C and N contents (r = 0.510*** and 0.615***, respectively). C and N content increases as to humus quality decreases. DRIFT spectra of fulvic acids turned out to be unsuitable for describing differences in humus quality. DRIFT spectra of humic acids and humin were hence more suitable. The difference between spruce and beech forest was found in 1514.cm-1 (C=C bounds of benzene rings) and 1550 cm-1 (N-H bounds in monosubstituted amides) bands intensities. Humic acids and humin coming from the O horizons of beech forest are relatively enriched by nitrogen functional groups. Values of humic acids aromaticity index did not differ between beech and spruce forests. DRIFT spectroscopy was shown as a possible method for detailed humus quality studying.

Keywords: forest soils; humus quality; DRIFT spectroscopy; humic acids; fulvic acids; humin

Published: March 31, 2006  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Mládková L, Rohošková M, Borůvka L. Methods for the Assessment of Humic Substances Quality in Forest Soils. Soil & Water Res. 2006;1(1):3-9. doi: 10.17221/6499-SWR.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Borůvka L., Mládková L., Drábek O., Vašát R. (2004): Prostorové rozložení ukazatelů acidifikace na území Jizerských hor. In: Neuhöferová P. (ed.): Obnova lesních ekosystémů Jizerských hor. Kostelec nad Černými lesy, 23.11.2004, KPL FLE ČZU Praha, 59-70.
    2. Borůvka L., Mládková L., Drábek O., Vašát R. (2005): Factors of spatial distribution of forest floor properties in the Jizera Mountains. Plant, Soil and Environment, 51: 316-321. Go to original source...
    3. Capriel P. (1997): Hydrophobicity of organic matter in arable soils: influence of management. European Journal of Soil Science, 48: 457-462. Go to original source...
    4. Capriel P., Beck T., Borchert H., Gronholz J., Zachmann G. (1995): Hydrophobicity of the organic matter in arable soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 27: 1453-1458. Go to original source...
    5. Machovič V., Novák F. (1998): Difúzně-reflexní infračervená spektroskopie půdních bitumenů z oblasti Šumavy. Chemické Listy, 92: 151-156.
    6. Martin D., Srivastava P.C., Ghosh D., Zech W. (1998): Characteristics of humic substances in cultivated and natural forest soils of Sikkim. Geoderma, 84: 345-362. Go to original source...
    7. Mládková L., Borůvka L., Drábek O. (2004): Distribution of aluminium among its mobilizable forms in soils of Jizera Mountains region. Plant, Soil and Environment, 50: 346-351. Go to original source...
    8. Mládková L., Borůvka L., Drábek O., Vašát R. (2006): Factors influencing distribution of different Al forms in the Jizera Mountains forest soils. Journal of Forest Science (Special Issue), 52: 87-92. Go to original source...
    9. Piccolo A., Celano G., Conte P. (2002): Methods of isolation and characterization of humic substances to study their interactions with pesticides. In: Proceedings of Conference Pesticide/Soil Interactions, Paris, 103-116.
    10. Pospíšil F. (1981): Group- and fractional composition of the humus of different soils. In: Transactions of the 5th International Soil Science Conference, Vol. 1. Research Institute for Soil Improvement, Prague, 135-138.
    11. Stevenson F.J. (1994): Humus Chemistry, Genesis, Composition, Reactions. 2nd Ed. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York. 
    12. Swift R.S. (1996): Organic matter characterization. In: Sparks D.L. (ed.): Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 3 - Chemical Methods. Soil Science Society of America
    13. Inc., American Society of Agronomy, Inc., Madison, 1011-1069.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content