Soil & Water Res., 2009, 4(10):S75-S82 | DOI: 10.17221/481-SWR

The comparison of water and matter flows in three small catchments in the Šumava Mountains

Jan PROCHÁZKA1, Jakub BROM1,2, Libor PECHAR1,2
1 Department of Landscape Management, Faculty of Agriculture, University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, České Budějovice, Czech Republic
2 ENKI, o.p.s., Třeboň, Czech Republic

The comparisons of water and matter flows have been evaluated in three small catchments with different land uses in the Šumava Mountains in the south-west of the Czech Republic since 1999. The catchment of the Mlýnský stream was artificially drained, the areas of the catchment retaining the character of drained, semi‑intensive pasture. The catchment of the Horský stream is covered with forest, mowed meadows, and locations with natural succession (wetlands). The catchment of the Bukový stream is covered with forest, mostly with spruce monoculture. The highest amount of water was discharged from the drained Mlýnský catchment whereas the amounts of water discharged from the Horský and Bukový catchments were lower. The runoff maxima in the hydrologic year of 2002 were recorded in the Mlýnský stream catchment in August - at the time of the catastrophic floods. On the other hand, the maximum discharges in the Horský and Bukový stream catchments in August 2002 were comparable with those that occurred in the spring during the snow melt. In comparison, the water chemistry showed relationships between trends and features and the results of water runoff. The comparison of the runoff and matter flows in the catchments studied confirmed the influence of the land cover and management in both normal and extreme rainfall-runoff conditions.

Keywords: water cycle; runoff; water chemistry; matter discharge; vegetation

Published: December 31, 2009  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
PROCHÁZKA J, BROM J, PECHAR L. The comparison of water and matter flows in three small catchments in the Šumava Mountains. Soil & Water Res. 2009;4(Special Issue 2):S75-82. doi: 10.17221/481-SWR.
Download citation

References

  1. Brom J., Pokorný J. (2009): Temperature and humidity characteristics of two willow stands, a peaty meadow and a drained pasture and their impact on landscape functioning. Boreal Environment Research, 14: 389-403.
  2. Chytil J., Hakrová P., Hudec K., Husák Š., Jandová J., Pellantová J. (eds) (1999): Wetlands of the Czech Republic - The List of the Water and Wetland Localities. Czech Ramsar Committee, Mikulov. (in Czech)
  3. Dohnal Z., Kunst M., Mejstřík V., Raučina Š., Vydra V. (1965): Peatlands and Moorlands of the Czechoslovakia. Academia, Praha. (in Czech)
  4. Fottová D. (2003): Trends in sulphur and nitrogen deposition fluxes in the GEOMON network, Czech Republic, between 1994 and 2000. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 150: 73-89. Go to original source...
  5. Gordon L.J., Steffen W., Jönsson B.F., Folke C., Falkenmark M., Johannessen Å. (2005): Human modification of global water vapour flows from the land surface. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102: 7612-7617. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Hakrová P. (2003): The research of conditions of the support of the specific diversity grasslands. [Ph.D. Thesis.] University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Faculty of Agriculture, České Budějovice. (in Czech)
  7. Majer V., Veselý J. (2005): Freshwater composition in the Šumava National Park. Silva Gabreta, 11: 69-81. (in Czech)
  8. Neuhäuslová Z. (ed.) (2001): Map of Potential Natural Vegetation of the Czech Republic. Academia, Praha. (in Czech)
  9. Piao S., Friedlingstein P., Ciais P., de Noblet-Ducoudré N., Labat D., Zaehle S. (2007): Changes in climate and land use have a larger direct impact than rising CO2 on global river runoff trends. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104: 15242-15247. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Prach K., Štech M., Beneš J. (1996): Secondary grasslands - a neglected component of biodiversity in the Šumava Mts. Silva Gabreta, 1: 243-247. (in Czech)
  11. Procházka J., Hakrová P., Pokorný J., Pecharová E., Hezina T., Wotavová K., Šíma M., Pechar L. (2001): Effect of different management practices on vegetation development, losses of soluble matter and solar energy dissipation in three small sub-mountain catchments. In: Vymazal J. (ed.): Transformations of Nutrients in Natural and Constructed Wetlands. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, 143-175.
  12. Procházka J., Včelák V. Wotavová K., Štíchová J., Pechar L. (2006): Holistic concept of landscape assessment: case study of three small catchments in the Šumava Mountains. Ekológia (Bratislava), 25 (Suppl. 3): 5-17.
  13. Procházka J., Brom J., Pechar L., Štíchová J., Pokorný J. (2008): Changes in concentrations of dissolved solids in precipitation and discharge water from drained pasture, natural wetland and spruce forest during the years of 1999-2006 in Šumava Mountains, Czech Republic. In: Vymazal J. (ed.): Wastewater Treatment, Plant Dynamics and Management. Springer Science + Bussines Media B.V., Heidelberg, 39-51. Go to original source...
  14. Rees R.M., Ribens J.C.H. (1995): Relationships between afforestation, water chemistry and fish stock in an upland catchment in south-west Scotland. Water, Air & Soil Pollution, 85: 303-330. Go to original source...
  15. Ripl W. (1995): Management of water cycle and energy flow for ecosystem control - the Energy-Transport-Reaction (ETR) model. Ecological Modelling, 78: 61-76. Go to original source...
  16. Ripl W. (2003): Water: the bloodstream of the biosphere. Philosophical Transaction, the Royal Society of London B, 358: 1921-1934. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Řezáčová D., Kakos V., Kašpar M., Müller M., Pešice P., Sokol Z. (2005): A comparison of flood precipitation in August 2002 with historical extreme precipitation events from the Czech territory. Atmospheric Research, 77: 354-366. Go to original source...
  18. Salkind N.J. (ed.) (2007): Encyclopedia of Measurement and Statistics. Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks. Go to original source...
  19. Spitzer K., Bufková I. (2008): Peat Bogs of the Šumava Mountains. Šumava National Park and Protected Landscape Area, Vimperk. (in Czech)
  20. StatSoft, Inc. (2005): STATISTICA (Data Analysis Software System), Version 7.1. www.statsoft.com.
  21. Stevens P.A., Hornung M., Hughes S. (1989): Solute concentration, fluxes and major nutriet cycles in mature Sitka spruce plantation in Beddgelert Forest, North Wales. Forest Ecological Management, 27: 1-20. Go to original source...
  22. Šálek M., Novák P., Kráčmar J. (2002): The utilization of the remote sensing methods during the flood in the Czech Republic in August 2002. Meteorological Bulletin, 55: 177-179. (in Czech)
  23. Šír M., Lichner Ľ., Tesař M., Krejča M., Váchal J. (2008): Soil water retention and gross primary productivity in the Zábrod area in the Šumava Mts. Soil and Water Research, 3 (Special Issue 1): S130-S138. Go to original source...
  24. Tesař M., Šír M., Lichner L., Fišák J. (2008): Extreme runoff formation in the Krkonoše Mts in August 2002. Soil and Water Research, 3: (Special Issue 1): S147-S154. Go to original source...
  25. Thimonier A., Dupouey J.L., le Tacon F. (2000): Recent losses of base cations from soil of Fagus sylvatica L. stands in northeastern France. Ambio, 29: 314-321. Go to original source...
  26. Wattenbach M., Zebich M., Hatterman F., Gotschalk P., Goemann H., Kreins P., Badeck F., Lasch P., Suckow F., Wechsung F. (2007): Hydrological impact assessment of afforestration and change in tree-species composition - A region case study for the Federal State of Brandenburg (Germany). Journal of Hydrology, 346: 1-17. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.