Soil & Water Res., 2017, 12(2):117-127 | DOI: 10.17221/176/2015-SWR

Evaluation of discrepancies in spatial distribution of rainfall erosivity in the Czech Republic caused by different approaches using GIS and geostatistical toolsOriginal Paper

Jiří BRYCHTA*, Miloslav JANEČEK
Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic

The study presents all approaches of rainfall erosivity factor (R) computation and estimation used in the Czech Republic (CR). A lot of distortions stem from the difference in erosive rainfall criteria, time period, tipping rain gauges errors, low temporal resolution of rainfall data, the type of interpolation method, and inappropriate covariates. Differences in resulting R values and their spatial distribution caused by the described approaches were analyzed using the geostatistical method of Empirical Bayesian Kriging and the tools of the geographic information system (GIS). Similarity with the highest temporal resolution approach using 1-min rainfall data was analyzed. Different types of covariates were tested for incorporation to the cokriging method. Only longitude exhibits high correlation with R and can be recommended for the CR conditions. By incorporating covariates such as elevation, with no or weak correlation with R, the results can be distorted even by 81%. Because of significant yearly variation of R factor values and not clearly confirmed methodology of R values calculation and their estimation at unmeasured places we recommend the R factor for agricultural land in the Czech Republic R = 40 MJ/ha.cm/h +/- 10% depends on geographic location.

Keywords: covariate; geostatistics; R factor; rainfall intensity; rainfall total; USLE, RUSLE-GIS method

Published: June 30, 2017  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
BRYCHTA J, JANEČEK M. Evaluation of discrepancies in spatial distribution of rainfall erosivity in the Czech Republic caused by different approaches using GIS and geostatistical tools. Soil & Water Res. 2017;12(2):117-127. doi: 10.17221/176/2015-SWR.
Download citation

References

  1. Bonila A.C., Vidal L.K. (2011): Rainfall erosivity in Central Chile. Journal of Hydrology, 410: 126-133. Go to original source...
  2. Dostál T. et al (2006): Partial Final Report of Project COST No. 1P04OC634.001 Methods and Ways of Predicting Surface Runoff, Erosion and Transport Processes in the Landscape. Prague, ČVUT. (in Czech)
  3. Goovaerts P. (1999): Using elevation to aid the geostatistical mapping of rainfall erosivity. Catena, 34: 27-242. Go to original source...
  4. Goovaerts P. (2000): Geostatistics in soil science: state-ofthe-art and perspectives. Geoderma, 89: 1-46. Go to original source...
  5. Hanel M., Máca P., Bašta P., Vlnas R., Pech P. (2016): Rainfall erosivity factor in the Czech Republic and its uncertainty. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 20: 4307-4322. Go to original source...
  6. Hermando D., Romana G.M. (2015): Estimating the rainfall erosivity factor from monthly precipitation data in the Madrid region (Spain). Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics, 63: 55-62. Go to original source...
  7. Janeček M. et al. (1992): Protection of Agricultural Land from Erosion. Prague, UVTIZ. (in Czech)
  8. Janeček M., Kubátová E., Tippl M. (2006): Revised determination of the rainfall-runoff erosivity factor R for application of USLE in the Czech Republic. Soil and Water Research, 1: 65-71. Go to original source...
  9. Janeček M., Kubátová E., Procházková E. (2012a): The influence of precipitation and rainfall intensity on soil loss by water erosion. Vodní hospodářství, 62: 134-137. (in Czech)
  10. Janeček M., Květon V., Kubátová E., Kobzová D. (2012b): Differention and regionalization of rainfall erosivity factor values in the Czech Republic. Soil and Water Research, 7: 1-9. Go to original source...
  11. Janeček M. et al (2012c): Protection of agricultural land from erosion, VUMOP, Prague. (in Czech)
  12. Janeček M., Květoň V., Kubátová E., Kobzová D. (2013): Values of rainfall erosivity factor for the Czech republic. Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanic, 61: 97-102. Go to original source...
  13. Krása J. (2004): Evaluation of Erosion Processes in Large River Basins with the Support of GIS. [Ph.D. Thesis.] Prague, Czech Technical University in Prague, Faculty of Civil Engineering. (in Czech)
  14. Krása J., Středová H., Dostál T., Novotný I. (2014): Rainfall erosivity research on the territory of the Czech Republic. In: Rožnovský J., Litschmann T. (eds): Mendel a Climatology, Brno, Sept 3-5, 2014.
  15. Krivoruchko K., Gribov A. (2014): Pragmatic Bayesian kriging for nonstationary and moderately non-Gaussian data. In: Mathematics of Planet Earth. Proc. 15th Annual Conf. Int. Association for Mathematical Geosciences. Springer: 61-64. Go to original source...
  16. Lee J.H., Heo J.H. (2011): Evaluation of estimation methods for rainfall erosivity based on annual precipitation in Korea. Journal of Hydrology, 409: 30-48. Go to original source...
  17. Mikhailova E.A., Bryant R.B., Schwager S.J., Smith S.D. (1997): Predicting rainfall erosivity in Honduras. Soil Science Society of American Journal, 61: 273-306. Go to original source...
  18. Moral F.J. (2010): Comparison of different geostatistical approaches to map climate variables: application to precipitation. International Journal of Climatology, 30: 620-631. Go to original source...
  19. Panagos P., Ballabio C., Borrelli P., Meusburger K., Klik A., Rousseva S., Perčec Tadić M., Michaelides S., Hrabalíková M., Olsen P., Aalto J., Lakatos M., Rymszewicz A., Dumitrescu A., Beguería S., Alewell C. (2015): Rainfall erosivity in Europe. Science of the Total Environment, 511: 801-814. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Phillips D.L., Dolph J., Marks D. (1992): A comparison of geostatistical procedures for spatial analysis of precipitations in mountainous terrain. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 58: 119-141. Go to original source...
  21. Pilz J., Spöck G. (2008): Why do we need and how should we implement Bayesian kriging methods. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 22: 621-632. Go to original source...
  22. Renard K.G., Freimund J.R. (1994): Using monthly precipitation data to estimate the R-factor in the revised USLE. Journal of Hydrology, 157: 287-306. Go to original source...
  23. Renard K.G., Foster G.R., Weesies G.A., Mccool D.K., Yoder D.C. (1997): Predicting Soil Erosion by Water: A Guide to Conservation Planning with the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE). USDA Agriculture Handbook No. 703, Washington D.C., USDA-ARS.
  24. Rogler H., Schwertmann U. (1981): Erosivitat der Niederschlage und Isoerodentkarte von Bayern. Zeitschrift für Kulturtechnik und Flurbereinigung, 22: 99-112.
  25. Schwertmann U., Vogel W., Kainz M. (1987): Bodenerosion durch Wasser. Stuttgart, E. Ulmer Gmbh.
  26. Sokolová I. (1992): Determining rainfall erosivity factor R for South Bohemian region. Pedologie a Meliorace, 28: 45-50. (in Czech)
  27. Švehla F., Skořepa Z. (1995): Adjusting the data for determining the value of K and R factors in Wischmeier-Smith's formula. Pozemkové úpravy, 11: 12-13. (in Czech)
  28. Toman F., Sanetrník J., Filip J. (1993): The influence of climatic conditions on the factor of erosion efficiency of torrential rains. In: Proc. Agro-meteorological Conference 93, Brno, Nov 25-26, 1993: 67-69. (in Czech)
  29. Torri D., Borselli L., Guzzeti F. et al. (2006): Soil erosion in Italy: an overview. In: Boardman J., Poesen J. (eds): Soil Erosion in Europe. New York, Wiley: 245-261. Go to original source...
  30. Van Der Knijff J.M., Jones R.J.A., Montanarella L. (2000): Soil Erosion Risk Assessment in Europe. Ispra, European Soil Bureau.
  31. Wischmeier W.H., Smith D.D. (1978): Predicting Rainfall Erosion Losses - A Guide to Conservation Planning. USDA Agricultural Handbook No. 537, Washington D.C., USDA.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.