Soil & Water Res., 2017, 12(2):128-135 | DOI: 10.17221/45/2016-SWR

Effect of windbreaks on wind speed reduction and soil protection against wind erosionOriginal Paper

David ŘEHÁČEK, Tomáš KHEL, Josef KUČERA, Jan VOPRAVIL, Martin PETERA
Research Institute for Soil and Water Conservation, Prague, Czech Republic

Windbreaks form efficient soil protection against wind erosion particularly at the time when soil cover is not protected by the cultivated plant vegetation cover. The objective of this research was to evaluate windbreaks efficiency in terms of wind speed reduction. Wind speed along the windbreaks was measured in the cadastral areas of Dobrovíz and Středokluky (Czech Republic, Central Europe). The measurement was carried out by 4 stations placed at windward side (1 station at the distance of 3 times the height of the windbreak) and at leeward side of the windbreak (3 stations at the distance of 3, 6, and 9 times the height of the windbreak). Each station contained 2 anemometers situated 0.5 and 1 m above surface. The character of windbreak was described by terrestrial photogrammetry method as the value of optical porosity from the photo documentation of the windbreak at the time of field measurement. A significant dependence between the value of optical porosity and efficiency of windbreak emerged from the results. The correlation coefficient between optical porosity and wind speed reduction was in the range of 0.842 to 0.936 (statistical significance more than 95%). A significant effect of windbreak on airflow reduction was proven on the leeward side of windbreak in a belt corresponding to approximately six times the height of the windbreaks depending on the optical porosity and it was expressed by a polynomial equation.

Keywords: airflow; anemometer; field measurement; optical porosity; soil conservation

Published: June 30, 2017  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
ŘEHÁČEK D, KHEL T, KUČERA J, VOPRAVIL J, PETERA M. Effect of windbreaks on wind speed reduction and soil protection against wind erosion. Soil & Water Res. 2017;12(2):128-135. doi: 10.17221/45/2016-SWR.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Abel N., Baxter J., Campbell A., Cleugh H., Fargher J., Lambeck R., Prinsley R., Prosser M., Ried R., Revell G., Schmidt C., Stirzaker R., Thornburn P. (1997): Design Principles for Farm Forestry: A Guide to Assist Farmers to Decide Where to Place Trees and Farm Plantations on Farms. Canberra, Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation.
    2. Bird P.R., Bicknell D., Bulman P.A., Burke S.J.A., Leys J.F., Parker J.N., van der Sommen F.J., Voller P. (1992): The role of shelter in Australia for protecting soils, plants and livestock. Agroforestry Systems, 18: 59-86. Go to original source...
    3. Brandle J.R., Hodges L., Zhou X.H. (2004): Windbreaks in North American agricultural systems. Agroforestry Systems, 61: 65-78. Go to original source...
    4. Burke S. (1998): Windbreaks. Port Melbourne, Inkata Press.
    5. Cornelis W.M., Gabriels D. (2005): Optimal windbreak design for wind-erosion control. Journal of Arid Environments, 61: 315-332. Go to original source...
    6. Cornelis W.M., Gabriels D., De Gryse S., Hartmann R. (2000): The efficiency of vegetative windbreaks in combating with erosion: Simulation and scaling. Science et Changements Planétaires - Sécheresse, 11: 52-57. (in French)
    7. Guan D., Zhang Y., Zhu T. (2003): A wind-tunnel study of windbreak drag. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 118: 75-84. Go to original source...
    8. Heisler G.M., DeWalle D.R. (1988): Effects of windbreak structure on wind flow. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 22/23: 41-69. Go to original source...
    9. Janeček M., Dostál T.,Kozlovsky-Dufková J., Dumbrovský M., Hůla J., Kadlec V., Kovář P., Krása T., Kubátová E., Kobzová D., Kudrnáčová M., Novotný I., Podhrázská J., Pražan J., Procházková E., Středová I., Toman F., Vopravil J., Vlasák J. (2012): Erosion Control in the Czech Republic - Handbook. Prague, Czech University of Life Sciences. (in Czech)
    10. Kenney W.A. (1987): A method for estimating windbreak porosity using digitized photographic silhouettes. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 39: 91-94. Go to original source...
    11. Kuhns M. (2012): Windbreak Benefits and Design. (Utah Forest Facts/Rural-Conservation Forestry). Logan, Utah State University Extension.
    12. Lampartová I., Schneider J., Vyskot I., Rajnoch M., Litschmann T. (2015): Impact of protective shelterbelt microclimate characteristics. Ekológia (Bratislava), 34: 101-110. Go to original source...
    13. Podhrázská J., Novotný I. (2007): Evaluation of the wind erosion risks in GIS. Soil and Water Research, 2: 10-13. Go to original source...
    14. Santiago J.L., Martin F., Cuerva A., Bezdenejnykh N., SanzAndres A. (2007): Experimental and numerical study of wind flow behind windbreaks. Atmospheric Environment, 41: 6406-6420. Go to original source...
    15. Středa T., Malenová P., Pokladníková H., Rožnovský J. (2008): The efficiency of windbreaks on the basis of wind field and optical porosity measurement. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 56: 281-288. Go to original source...
    16. Středová H., Podhrázská J., Litschmann T., Středa T., Rožnovský J. (2012): Aerodynamic parameters of windbreak based on its optical porosity. Contributions to Geophysics and Geodesy, 42: 2013-226. Go to original source...
    17. Středová H., Spáčilová B., Podhrázská J., Chuchma F. (2015): A universal meteorological method to identify potential risk of wind erosion on heavy-textured soils. Moravian Geographical Reports, 23: 56-62. Go to original source...
    18. Tamang B., Andreu M.G., Friedman M.H., Rockwood D.L. (2012): Windbreak designs and planting for Florida agricultural fields. FOR227. Gainesville, University of Florida Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences. Available at http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu (accessed October 2015).
    19. Thuyet V.D., Do V.T., Sato T., Hung T.T. (2014): Effects of species and shelterbelt structure on wind speed reduction in shelter. Agroforestry Systems, 88: 237-244. Go to original source...
    20. Torita H., Satou H. (2007): Relations between shelterbelt structure and mean wind reduction. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 145: 186-194. Go to original source...
    21. Van Pelt R.S., Zobeck T.M., Baddock M.C., Cox J.J. (2010): Design, construction, and calibration of a portable boundary layer wind tunnel for field use. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 53: 1413-1422. Go to original source...
    22. Vigiak O., Sterk G., Warren A., Hagen L.J. (2003): Spatial modeling of wind speed around windbreaks. Catena, 52: 273-288. Go to original source...
    23. Wu T., Yu M., Wanf G., Wang Z., Duan X., Dong Y., Cheng X. (2013): Effects of stand structure on wind speed reduction in a Metasequoia glyptostroboides shelterbelt. Agroforestry Systems 87: 251-257. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content