Soil & Water Res., 2018, 13(2):90-97 | DOI: 10.17221/130/2017-SWR

Spatial heterogeneity of surface roughness on tilled loess slopes in erosion stagesOriginal Paper

Qingfeng ZHANG*, Jian WANG, Faqi WU
Northwest A&F University, Yangling, P.R. China

The main soil erosion areas of the Chinese Loess Plateau are tilled slopes. The knowledge of their spatial heterogeneity will contribute to the understanding of erosion mechanisms on a microtopographic scale. In this study, the spatial heterogeneity of four conventionally tilled slopes was examined under simulated rainfall conditions using a semivariogram-based methodological framework. Results show that all tilled slopes have a relatively stable spatial structure and the erosion stages of all tilled slopes have a similar spatial variability. The rainfall in the splash, sheet, and rill erosion stages has a degree of relief effect, strengthening effect, and relief effect on the surface roughness, respectively. However, the effects of tillage practices and slope gradient on the spatial heterogeneity are much larger than those of the rainfall. The spatial heterogeneity decreases with increasing slope gradient. The general autocorrelation scale of the tilled slopes is 3.15 m and their fractal dimension ranges from 1.59 to 1.85. The tilled slopes have certain anisotropy with respect to the slope direction from 10° to 22.5° while they show isotropy or weaker anisotropy in other directions. In this work, a semivariogram-based methodological framework was established for the spatial heterogeneity of microtopographic-scale slopes. The results also provide a theoretical foundation for future tillage measures on sloping fields of the Loess Plateau.

Keywords: erosion effect; semivariogram; surface roughness; tillage measures

Published: June 30, 2018  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
ZHANG Q, WANG J, Faqi W. Spatial heterogeneity of surface roughness on tilled loess slopes in erosion stages. Soil & Water Res. 2018;13(2):90-97. doi: 10.17221/130/2017-SWR.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Andrés P., Mathieu J., Charles L.B. (2015): How do slope and surface roughness affect plot-scale overland flow connectivity? Journal of Hydrology, 528: 192-205. Go to original source...
    2. Crawford C.A.G., Hergert G.W. (1997): Incorporating spatial trends and anisotropy in geostatistical mapping of soil properties. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 61: 298-309. Go to original source...
    3. Flagg C.B., Neff J.C., Reynolds R.L., Belnap J. (2014): Spatial and temporal patterns of dust emissions (2004-2012) in semi-arid landscapes, southeastern Utah, USA. Aeolian Research, 15: 31-43. Go to original source...
    4. Govers G., Takken I., Helming K. (2000): Soil roughness and overland flow. Agronomie, 20: 131-146. Go to original source...
    5. Guedes L.P.C., Uribe-Opazo M.A., Junior P.J.R. (2013): Influence of incorporating geometric anisotropy on the construction of thematic maps of simulated data and chemical attributes of soil. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research, 73: 414-423. Go to original source...
    6. Jiang H.L., Liu G.S., Wang X.Z., Song W.F., Zhang R.N., Zhang C.H. (2010): Spatial variability of soil properties in a long-term tobacco plantation in central China. Soil Science, 175: 137-144. Go to original source...
    7. Li H., Reynolds J.F. (1995): On definition and quantification of heterogeneity. Oikos, 73: 280-284. Go to original source...
    8. Lung C.W., Jiang J., Tian E.K., Zhang C.H. (1999): Relation between fractal dimension and roughness index for fractal surfaces. Physical Review E Statistical Physics Plasmas Fluids & Related Interdisciplinary Topics, 60: 5121-5124. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    9. Lü Y.Z., Li B.G., Cui Y. (2006): Micro-scale spatial variance of soil nutrients under different plant communities. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 39: 1581-1588. Impacts of rainfall intensity and slope gradient on rill erosion processes at loessial hillslope. Soil & Tillage Research, 155: 429-436. Go to original source...
    10. Moreno Marta M., Moreno Carmen, Lacasta Carlos, Meco Ramón (2012): Evolution of Soil Biochemical Parameters in Rainfed Crops: Effect of Organic and Mineral Fertilization. Applied and Environmental Soil Science, 2012, 1-9 DOI: 10.1155/2012/826236 Go to original source...
    11. Pandey Vanita, Pandey Pankaj K. (2010): Spatial and Temporal Variability of Soil Moisture. International Journal of Geosciences, 01, 87-98 DOI: 10.4236/ijg.2010.12012 Go to original source...
    12. Peñuela A., Javaux M., Bielders C.L. (2015): How do slope and surface roughness affect plot-scale overland flow connectivity? Journal of Hydrology, 528: 192-205. Go to original source...
    13. Römkens M.J.M., Wang J.Y. (1984): The effect of tillage on surface roughness. American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 84: 2026-2042.
    14. Shen H.O., Zheng F.L., Wen L.L., Han Y., Hu W. (2016): Impacts of rainfall intensity and slope gradient on rill erosion processes at loessial hillslope. Soil & Tillage Research, 155: 429-436. Go to original source...
    15. Vázquez E.V., Miranda J.G.V., Paz-Ferreiro J. (2010): A multifractal approach to characterize cumulative rainfall and tillage effects on soil surface micro-topography and to predict depression storage. Biogeosciences, 7: 2099-2141. Go to original source...
    16. Vidal V.E., Vivas M.J.G., Paz G.A. (2005): Characterizing anisotropy and heterogeneity of soil surface microtopography using fractal models. Ecological Modelling, 182: 337-353. Go to original source...
    17. Webster R. (1985): Quantitative spatial analysis of soil in field. Advances in Soil Science, 3: 1-70. Go to original source...
    18. Wei J., Zhou J., Tian J.L., He X.B., Tang K.L. (2006): Decoupling soil erosion and human activities on the Chinese Loess Plateau in the 20th century. Catena, 68: 10-15. Go to original source...
    19. WRB (2014): World Reference Base for Soil Resources, International Soil Classification System for Naming Soils and Creating Legends For Soil Maps. 2014. World Soil Resources Reports No. 106. FAO, Rome.
    20. Zhang Q.F., Zhao L.S., Wang J., Wu F.Q. (2014): Spatiotemporal variability and simulation of tillaged loess microtopography in water erosion. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 69: 343-351. Go to original source...
    21. Zhang Q.F., Wang J., Zhao L.S., Wu F.Q., Zhang Z.Y., Torbert A.H. (2015): Spatial heterogeneity of surface roughness during different erosive stages of tilled loess slopes under a rainfall intensity of 1.5 mm∙min-1. Soil & Tillage Research, 153: 95-103. Go to original source...
    22. Zhao L.S., Liang X.L., Wu F.Q. (2014): Soil surface roughness change and its effect on runoff and erosion on the loess plateau of china. Journal of Arid Land, 6: 400-409. Go to original source...
    23. Zheng F.L., Zhao J. (2004): A brief introduction on the rainfall simulation laboratory and equipment. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 11: 177-178. (in Chinese)
    24. Zhou Z.C., Shangguan Z.P. (2007): The effects of ryegrass roots and shoots on loess erosion under simulated rainfall. Catena 70: 350-355. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content