Soil & Water Res., 2018, 13(4):185-192 | DOI: 10.17221/237/2017-SWR

The use of Snyder synthetic hydrograph for simulation of overland flow in small ungauged and gauged catchmentsOriginal Paper

Darya FEDOROVA*, Pavel KOVÁŘ, Jan GREGAR, Andrea JELÍNKOVÁ, Jana NOVOTNÁ
Department of Land Use and Improvement, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic

The paper presents the results of simulated overland flow on the Třebsín experimental area, Czech Republic, using the Snyder synthetic unit hydrograph. In this research an attempt was made to discover a new approach to overland flow simulation that could give precise results like the KINFIL model for a small ungauged catchment. The provided results also include a comparison with the KINFIL model for N = 10, 20, 50 and 100 year recurrence of rainfall-runoff, with the rainfall time duration td = 10, 20, 30, and 60 min. Concerning a small gauged catchment, one of the most accurate and elegant methodologies, Matrix Inversion Model, can be used for the measurement of both the gross rainfall and the runoff. This method belongs to a matrix algebra concept. For the sake of completeness, we designated this model at the end of the present article to show how exact this forward march can be.

Keywords: extreme rainfall; infiltration intensity; KINFIL model; Matrix Inversion Model; Snyder unit hydrograph

Published: December 31, 2018  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
FEDOROVA D, KOVÁŘ P, GREGAR J, JELÍNKOVÁ A, NOVOTNÁ J. The use of Snyder synthetic hydrograph for simulation of overland flow in small ungauged and gauged catchments. Soil & Water Res. 2018;13(4):185-192. doi: 10.17221/237/2017-SWR.
Download citation

References

  1. Bernard M. (1935): An approach to determinate stream flow. Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers, 100: 347-362. Go to original source...
  2. Beven K.J. (2006): Rainfall-Runoff Modelling. The Primer. Chichester, John Wiley & Sons.
  3. Černohous V., Kovář P. (2009): Forest watershed runoff changes determined using the unit hydrograph method. Journal of Forest Science, 55: 89-95. Go to original source...
  4. Clark C. (1945): Storage and unit hydrograph. Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers, 110: 1419-1446. Go to original source...
  5. Dooge J., O'Kane P. (2003): Deterministic Methods in Systems hydrology. IHE Delft Lecture Note Series, CRC Press.
  6. Ellouze-Gargouri E., Bargaoui Z. (2012): Runoff Estimation for an Ungauged Catchment Using Geomorphological Instantaneous Unit Hydrograph (GIUH) and Copulas. Water Resources Management, 26: 1615-1638. Go to original source...
  7. Fedorova D., Bačinová H., Kovář P. (2017): Use of terraces to reduce overland flow and soil erosion, comparison of the HEC-HMS model and the KINFIL model application. Soil and Water Research, 12: 195-201. Go to original source...
  8. Hoffmeister G., Weisman R. (1977): Accuracy of synthetic hydrographs derived from representative basin. Hydrological Sciences, 22: 297-312. Go to original source...
  9. Hrachowitz M., Savenije H., Blöschl G., McDonnell J., Sivapalan M., Pomeroy J., Arheimer B., Blume T., Clark M., Ehret U., Fenicia F., Freer J., Gelfan A., Gupta H., Hughes D., Hut R., Montanari A., Pande S., Tetzlaff D., Troch P., Uhlenbrook S., Wagener T., Winsemius H., Woods R., Zehe E., Cudennec C. (2013): A decade of predictions in ungauged basins (PUB) - a review. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 58: 1198-1255. Go to original source...
  10. Hrádek F., Kovář P. (1994): Computation of design rainfalls. Vodní hospodářství, 11: 49-53. (in Czech)
  11. Kibler D.F., Woolhiser D.A. (1970): The Kinematic Cascade as a Hydrologic Model. Hydrology Paper No. 39, Fort Collins, Colorado State University.
  12. Kovář P., Vaššová D., Hrabalíková M. (2011): Mitigation of surface runoff and erosion impacts on catchment by stone hedgerows. Soil and Water Research, 6: 153-164. Go to original source...
  13. Kutílek M., Nielsen D. (1994): Soil Hydrology. CremlingenDestedt, Catena Verlag: 98-102.
  14. Mays L. (2010): Water Resources Engineering. 2nd Ed. New York, John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
  15. McCarthy G. (1939): The Unit Hydrograph and Flood Routing. Providence, US Corps of Engineers Office.
  16. Mein R.G., Larson C.L. (1973): Modelling infiltration during a steady rain. Water Resources Research, 9: 384-394. Go to original source...
  17. Melching C., Marquardt J. (1997): Equations for Estimating Synthetic Unit-Hydrograph Parameter Values for Small Watersheds in Lake County, Illinois. Urbana, Open-File Report, US Geological Survey. Go to original source...
  18. Morel-Seytoux H.J. (1982): Analytical results for prediction of variable rainfall infiltration. Journal of Hydrology, 59: 209-230. Go to original source...
  19. Morel-Seytoux H.J., Verdin J.P. (1981): Extension of the SCS Rainfall Runoff Methodology for Ungaged Watersheds. [Report FHWA/RD-81/060.] Springfield, US National Technical Information Service.
  20. O'Donnell T. (1960): Instantaneous Unit Hydrograph Derivation by Harmonic Analysis. IASH Publication No. 51, Commission of Surface Waters: 546 - 557.
  21. Parajka J., Viglione A., Rogger M., Salinas J.L., Sivapalan M., Blöschl G. (2013): Comparative assessment of predictions in ungauged basins - Part 1: Runoff-hydrograph studies. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 17: 1783-1795. Go to original source...
  22. Philip J.R. (1957): The theory of infiltration. The infiltration equation and its solution. Soil Science, 83: 345-357. Go to original source...
  23. Ponce V.M. (1989): Engineering Hydrology: Principles and Practices. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River.
  24. Ramírez J.A. (2000): Prediction and Modelling of Flood Hydrology and Hydraulics. Chapter 11. In: Wohl E. (ed.): Inland Flood Hazards: Human, Riparian and Aquatic Communities. New York, Cambridge University Press: 293-329. Go to original source...
  25. Razi M.A., Ariffin J., Tahir W., Arish N.A. (2010): Flood Estimation Studies using Hydrologic Modelling System (HEC-HMS) for Johor River, Malaysia. Journal of Applied Sciences, 10: 930-939. Go to original source...
  26. Rigon R., Bancheri M., Formetta G., de Lavenne A. (2016): The geomorphological unit hydrograph from a historicalcritical perspective. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 41: 27-37. Go to original source...
  27. Sherman L.K. (1932): Stream flow from rainfall by the unit hydrograph method. Engineering News Record, 108: 501-505.
  28. Singh P.K., Mishra S.K., Jain M.K. (2014): A review of the synthetic unit hydrograph: from the empirical UH to advanced geomorphological methods. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 59: 239-261. Go to original source...
  29. Snyder F. (1938): Synthetic unit-graphs. Eos, Transactions, American Geophysical Union, 19: 447-454. Go to original source...
  30. Snyder F. (1961): Study of the Tennessee Valley Authority. Matrix Operation in Hydrograph Computations. Research Paper 1, Knoxville, Office of Tributary Area Development.
  31. Štibinger J. (2011): Infiltration capacities. Stavební obzor, 2/2011: 78-83. (in Czech)
  32. Vaššová D., Kovář P. (2011): DES_RAIN, Computational Program. Prague, FZP CZU.
  33. Wałęga A., Grzebinoga M., Paluszkiewicz B. (2011): On using the Snyder and Clark unit hydrograph for calculations of flood waves in a highland catchment (the Grabinka river example). Acta Scientiarum Polonorum, Formatio Circumiectus, 10: 47-56.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.