Soil & Water Res., 2018, 13(4):218-225 | DOI: 10.17221/158/2017-SWR

Fuzzy AHP for drought risk assessment in Lam Ta Kong watershed, the north-eastern region of ThailandOriginal Paper

Saowanee WIJITKOSUM*
Environmental Research Institute, Chulalongkorn University, Pathumwan, Bangkok, Thailand

Droughts occur from a combination of natural factors and human activities rather than just a single natural cause. Spatial factors have also heavily influenced the causes of draught. This study was conducted in the Lam Ta Kong watershed, Thailand. In this study, the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) method was applied to evaluate the risk of agricultural drought and the GIS technique was employed to give full consideration to the ambiguity and uncertainty of the agricultural drought risk. There are five risk factors to consider in the agricultural drought risk assessment and they are divided in a total of fifteen criteria: physical factors (slope gradient and elevation), climatic (rainfall and aridity index), soil (texture, drainage, fertility, erosion, and soil salinity), land utilization (land use and land cover) and water resources (precipitation days, stream density, distance from an irrigation canal, and groundwater volume). These criteria determine the weight and score used to evaluate their parental risk factors. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) was applied together with the triangular fuzzy numbers (TFNs) method to assess the data obtained from the criteria to achieve the drought risk assessment. The results indicated that the overall risk of the Lam Ta Kong area was at a moderate risk of agricultural drought (50.45%), of which 15.63% of the total area was at a high risk of agricultural drought. Moreover, 0.40% of the total area located at the central part of the watershed was at a very high risk which was due to its saline soil with > 50% dense salt crust. This research indicated that the major factors causing droughts in the watershed were related to the soil factors, especially soil texture, soil fertility and soil salinity. These soil factors were considered as the driving factors of drought. The results of this study can be used for land use planning and water resource management in order to prepare for droughts in the watershed.

Keywords: agricultural drought; defuzzification; drought index; drought risk; FAHP

Published: December 31, 2018  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
WIJITKOSUM S. Fuzzy AHP for drought risk assessment in Lam Ta Kong watershed, the north-eastern region of Thailand. Soil & Water Res. 2018;13(4):218-225. doi: 10.17221/158/2017-SWR.
Download citation

Supplementary files:

Download fileWijitkosum_Figure S1_ESM.pdf

File size: 2.71 MB

References

  1. An M., Huang S., Baker C.J. (2007): Railway risk assessmentthe fuzzy reasoning approach and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process approaches: a case study of shunting at waterloo depot. In: Proc. Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F. Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 221: 365-382. Go to original source...
  2. Bagley J.E., Desai A.R., Harding K.J., Snyder P.K., Foley J.A. (2014): Drought and deforestation: has land cover change influenced recent precipitation extremes in the Amazon? American Meteorological Society, 27: 345-361. Go to original source...
  3. Biazin B., Sterk G. (2013): Drought vulnerability drives landuse and land cover changes in the Rift Valley dry lands of Ethiopia. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 164: 100-113. Go to original source...
  4. Blaylock A.D. (1994): Soil Salinity, Salt Tolerance and Growth Potential of Horticultural and Landscape Plants. Laramie, University of Wyoming, Co-operative Extension Service. Available at http://www.wyomingextension.org/agpubs/pubs/WY988.PDF
  5. Chang D.Y. (1996): Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 95: 649-655. Go to original source...
  6. Chen L., Song Y., Li S., Zhang L., Zou C., Yu D. (2012): The role of WRKY transcription factors in plant abiotic stresses. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1819: 120-128. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Cox P.M., Harris P.P., Huntingford C., Betts R.A., Collins M., Jones C.D., Jupp T.E., Marengo J.A., Nobre C.A. (2008): Increasing risk of Amazonian drought due to decreasing aerosol pollution. Nature, 453: 212-215. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Dinh L.C., Duc (2012): GIS and analytic hierarchy process for land evaluation. Asia Geospatial Digest, October: 1-12.
  9. Hou Y., Hu X., Yan W., Zhang S., Niu L. (2013): Effect of organic fertilizers used in sandy soil on the growth of tomatoes. Agricultural Science, 4: 31-34. Go to original source...
  10. Kaufmann A., Gupta M.M. (1988): Fuzzy Mathematical Models in Engineering and Management Science. Amsterdam, Elsevier.
  11. Lal R., Stewart B.A. (eds.) (2013): Principles of Sustainable Soil Management in Agroecosystems. 1st Ed., Bosa Roca, CRC Press. Go to original source...
  12. Lillesand T., Kiefer R., Chipman J. (2008): Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation. 6th Ed. New York, John Wiley & Sons.
  13. Peng D., Wu C., Zhang B., Huete A., Zhang X., Sun R., Lei L., Huang W., Liu L., Liu X., Li J., Luo S., Fang B. (2016): The influences of drought and land-cover conversion on interannual variation of NPP in the Three-North Shelterbelt Program Zone of China based on MODIS data. PLoS ONE, 11: e0158173. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Radionovs A., Užga-Rebrovs O. (2016): Fuzzy analytical hierarchy process for ecological risk assessment. Information Technology and Management Science, 19: 16-22. Go to original source...
  15. Saaty T.L. (1996): Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: the Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications, Pennsylvania.
  16. Saaty T.L. (2008): Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1: 83-98. Go to original source...
  17. Sa-Nguansilp C., Wijitkosum S., Sriprachote A. (2017): Agricultural drought risk assessment in Lam Ta Kong watershed. International Journal of Geoinformatics, 13: 37-43. Go to original source...
  18. Santos J.R., Pagsuyoin S.T., Herrera L.C., Tan R.R., Yu K.D. (2014): Analysis of drought risk management strategies using dynamic inoperability input-output modelling and event tree analysis. Environment Systems and Decisions, 34: 492-506. Go to original source...
  19. Tian J., Yan Z.F. (2013): Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process for risk assessment to general-assembling of satellite. Journal of Applied Research and Technology, 11: 568-577. Go to original source...
  20. Tuysuz F., Kahraman C. (2006): Project risk evaluation using a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process: an application to information technology projects. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 21: 229-284. Go to original source...
  21. Van Laarhoven P.J.M., Pedrycz W. (1983): A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory. Journal Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 11: 199-227. Go to original source...
  22. Wang W., Luoh L. (2000): Simple computation for the defuzzifications of center of sum and center of gravity. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 9: 53-59.
  23. Wang Y.M. (2009): Centroid defuzzification and the maximizing set and minimizing set ranking based on alpha level sets. Journal Computers and Industrial Engineering, 57: 228-236. Go to original source...
  24. Wang Y.M., Elhag T.M.S. (2007): A fuzzy group decision making approach for bridge risk assessment. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 53: 137-148. Go to original source...
  25. Wang Y.M., Elhag T.M.S., Hua Z.S. (2006): A modified fuzzy logarithmic least quares method for fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 157: 3055-3071. Go to original source...
  26. Wessels K.J., Prince S.D., Frost P.E., van Zyl D. (2004): Assessing the effects of human-induced land degradation in the former homelands of northern South Africa with a 1 km AVHRR NDVI time-series. Remote Sensing of Environment, 91: 47-67. Go to original source...
  27. Whitmore A.P., Whalley W.R. (2009): Physical effects of soil drying on roots and crop growth. Journal of Experimental Botany, 60: 2845-2857. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  28. Wijitkosum S. (2012): Impacts of land use changes on soil erosion in Pa Deng sub-district, adjacent area of Kaeng Krachan National Park, Thailand. Soil and Water Research, 7: 10-17. Go to original source...
  29. Wijitkosum S. (2014): The impact of land use and spatial changes on desertification risk in degraded areas in Thailand. Sustainable Environment Research, 26: 84-92. Go to original source...
  30. Wijitkosum S. (2016): A Report on Agricultural Drought Assessment of Lam Ta Khong Watershed. In-depth Strategic Research Cluster. Bangkok, Chulalongkorn University.
  31. Wijitkosum S., Sriburi T. (2016): Innovation in Increasing the Organic Carbon in Soil for Sustainable Agricultural Purpose in Saline Soil Areas: 1st Year Pilot Project at the Lam Ta Kong Watershed. Bangkok, Chulalongkorn University.
  32. Yang J.Y., Zhang L.L. (2012): Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method on water environmental quality based on entropy weight with consideration of toxicology of evaluation factors. Advanced Materials, 356: 2383-2388. Go to original source...
  33. Yang X., Ding J., Hou H. (2013): Application of a triangular Fuzzy AHP approach for flood risk evaluation and response measure analysis. Natural Hazards, 68: 657-674. Go to original source...
  34. Zhang J.T. (2006): Grassland degradation and our strategies: a case from Shanxi province, China. Rangelands, 28: 37-43. Go to original source...
  35. Zhao C., Deng X., Yuan Y., Yan H., Liang H. (2013): Prediction of drought risk based on the WRF model in Yunnan Province of China. Advances in Meteorology, 2013: 1-8. Go to original source...
  36. Zou L., Dai H., Yao E., Jiang T., Guo H. (2014): Research on assessment methods for urban public transport development in China. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 941347. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.